Why not just integrate Archer on the Boxer
Boxer isn’t long enough iirc so you’d run into space limitations for crew etc. The Archer also has a smaller internal magazine, it’s got a 20/21 (I’ve seen both numbers, I don’t know it’s its 20+1 in the autoloader or just people assuming that) round magazine, the RCH has a 30 magazine. The final nail in the coffin is that the RCH is capable of fire on the move and is fully stabilised, which really helps it with the shoot and scoot requirements.
Lmao
amazing 10/10
Honestly part of me thinks that could be really fun
Lethal?)))) Sounds a little weird. Personally, I perceive this proposal as a fatal outcome for the challenger.))
I think they should use the “powerful” instead “lethal”.
No lethal is correct, something that kills other things is considered lethal.
the new BR changes as something interesting.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/2/d/e/2PACX-1vRdz2C08_QRD7PKxRyWWk0p722lzZsIQAwH05Ma5ACRgluyS_hMpdv0D4FWNOFFU8gkdGJEtc8fWEaA/pubhtml#
The Challenger DS is getting L26 and being moved to 10.3. that was the shell it was missing right?
Yeah, but the Rooikat Mk.1D is getting shafted lmao. Now the same BR as the Vickers Mk.11, because yes, 76mm APFSDS and 105mm APFSDS are very much equivlents lmao, I swear gaijin uses RNG to decide BRs
this change doesnt make any sense, how do we protest this
Yes im very happy with this
Yep, it’s awesome. Though they totally ignored all the posts about Britain air
I left a review where I specifically wrote that mk1d stands out too much against the background of 8.3 and it doesn’t seem fair to many players. Based on my review, it was corrected
Yes 76mm apfsds weak than 105mm but very strong at 8.3