Yeah seems like It
Is ugly but which BR It will be is the question I would like It at like 7.3 because the T-54 1947 is already BR7.7 but idk what gaijin will do
Yeah seems like It
Yeah i dont think its even that crazy to say 7.0 as the SU-100P and obj 268 are there already, really depends on gaijins design of it
It will be good at its job might find its home in many line ups.
It is a little complicated because its fairly well armored, has the same combat capabilities as the su100p but also an autoloader, very good mobility and could be potentially extremely destructive
If It have a autoloader It could be 7.0 yeah the fren AMX is 7.0 with It I see It fair
But well I suppose that they will probably send It to 7.3 would like It at 7.0 just for used It with the T-44-100 and my SPH 2S19M2
Yep
So it isnt very bad but ithas an innacurate reverse speed, as 5km/h doesnt fit with the many reports of it reversing fast
thank you for the support everyone; couldn’t have done it without yall ❤️
Idk if It have a autoloader just because they use aced crew on the Stream
dev serv should be open by now, though 10s is probably the autoloader as they took the mid 5-7 shots/minute report and gave it a 6 shots/minute, the more annoying thing is the -3 degrees of depression where there are 0 sources for it, all source claim -5, classic gaijin nerfing itself with a fairly hyped vehicle
Make a bug report about it and the reverse speed you mentioned earlier.
Ok I Saw a vid already It don’t have a autoloader in game It have like 12.5s reload with normal crew soo why this thing is the same BR of the AMX M4 meanwhile being way worse gaijin logic
Yea im really not sure what is the deal with gaijin, they also messed up its depression and didnt give it it’s heat round, and now auto-loader, fucking a
I readed that It have a semiautoloader like the ones on SPHs still this is bad for be 7.0 12.5 sec reload weak turret armor very bad depression nearly unusable on maps with hills bad reverse this is just a SU-100P but that can survive HE overpressure but slower and want more easy to oneshoot at 0.7 highter BR
They massacred my boy
And the worst part is anything that isnt a manual isnt considered an official bug report source for them, yet i bet ya that the devs got 99% of their info from claude or some shit
I mean im playing it, it ainr bad, but nor good
shouldn’t the turret traverse be limited to 120 dregrees on both sides as the driver sat in the turret and to prevent disorientation.
The same problem the US had with the mbt 70 program.
Where have you seen those many reports ? Based on its transmission kinematic diagram and on general knowledge of other Soviet tanks of the era having a relatively high gear ratio for the reverse gear (which is pretty much confirmed by the Z (teeth) number being the highest of available gears, identical to the first gear, that being 36), I find it very unlikely that a single reverse and first gear would both manage their respective 0-20 range on a 5 fwd speed 50 kp/h tank.
