As someone who DOES do ground attacking I must say that this mode is a perfect example how triggered people get when they aren’t catered too 24/7 by the devs. I think the change to nerf the Air kill rewards while buffing the ground rewards did wonders to the mode and was not just what I wanted but many other people too who don’t linger on the forums. This is a SEAD mode after all and not a “arb 2.0 with bigger map + funky ground targets” mode and i think they should have buffed the ground reward form the get-go and now more than ever is it VERY important that the devs DO NOT listen to the complainers and they didn’t which was very good on their part.
2 Likes
Is so much painful to grind after nerf, before the nerf I can grind 2 star within 2 hour (brainrot playstyle) but now I already spend almost 6 hour and still didn’t get 1 star. The pure Russian Bias and the point nerf just make doing everything pointless because you won’t get enough point of even the 30kt nuke most of the time.
Hard disagree. The Air kill reward nerf was completely unnecessary. They should’ve just buffed the rewards for ground targets, maybe increase costs for the big nukes and leave everything else alone.
4 Likes
It’s fun that after the last couple of updates they disappeared as our feedbacks don’t matter anymore. They made their decisions, completely ignoring our opinion, leaving us arguing on a destroyed event.
1 Like
Dude WTF are these changes!!! Air Battles feel worthless now
1 Like
Also, can Gayjin not give a fast aircraft that carries Anti Radiation Misssiles if they want us to ground pound?
1 Like
I am not doing shit in A-7Es bruh, I fkin stall out trying to dodge OSAs in that thing
Just use the F4E with AGMs
Try to say all the stuff you wanna say in 1 message
And yes we all understand the pain
1 Like
Mb, I was just kinda mad
I find climbing to 1500m and then doing an inverted split s and climbing after helps with wasting the osas energy and giving your agm88 time to hit the target
1 Like
Very understandable with the event as it is.
2 Likes
But AGMs are kinda innacurate, no? I tried using them but they smash into trees instead
this would have done exactly nothing and kept it at being a arb 2.0 with bigger map and funky ground targets. this would have benefitted the small minority that was playing SEAD anyways but it wouldn’t have caused people to at least consider to try doing SEAD in this SEAD focused event.
1 Like
We all are to a degree,try to not unleash all the anger here with 10 messages all 1 second from each other
And at least try to be more logical with that anger saying for example “This thing is trash BUT we could get ***This *** thing (name of plane and why)” ah example
We could get F-111A, no? How does that sound?
What if I run into an enemy and they fire a radar guided missile at me? I would be fcked
1 Like
They are insanely accurate,as long you actually lock the vehicle (Use the POD to properly aim precisely) and see for yourself
The AGMs on F111F and F4E works pretty well once you understand how to use them
Said so…for russian counterpart still f2p you have Su25 with both TV and Laser guided missile which its the loadout i use and it works very well expecially when i have 3 laser guided missiles and i can simply tap every vehicle in a convoy with a difference of 3 seconds at max
You can use the Su24 too but uhh,i recommend you use the Su25 cause of more agility since the Su24 its a brick
Yep that’s the risk of SEAD it was historically very dangerous I try to do it in an area that people aren’t fighting like the north or south front line air fields
Most people (F2P) use R24Ts and R60s on the Mig23 and the radar on the F4E its just…none so only stuck with Aim9Ls
As long you know which plane do what better you will be fine
I have no prioi experience of using AGMs, I am a low BR player
Do you have to climb a bit to fire them?