First off, thats not fair, @Morvran is in every thread and any he isn’t is he soon will be. You just need to say the word BOL and he will be here.
Secondly, I’d like to find evidence there is a way to get missile rails on the PIDS+ pylons to make them more useful. Loads of players want to see this.
Hold on here, who is arguing? I found where you guys can find some references yourselves. I given you a lead, do what you want with it.
Why should I provide anything? So that it ultimately sits in queue? Like the maverick?
it looks like ADU-552/A, but different.
Its not the only way to make them useful.
Have you looked into the helmet sight capability that PIDS+ (BD configuration only) offers that visually marks threats as well as even gunfire?
It was rudimentarily modelled in the TWS at release, but was a OP as it detected heading, velocity and range data at max range as the radar. Real world, its a passive optical system and cannot measure these elements direct. It should only detect the object and measures range over time.
A full track file cannot be determined with optical sensors in reality, and the information oversaturated the player as you can see. Simple detection markers without track file information with set detection range when the pylons are equipped would be best instead of only when tws is selected.
PIDS+ offers 360 degree protection, its not in-game either at all. Player uses one pylon, they should get half the coverage.
It was removed and made a comeback, even added to the F-15E pod, but only difference was that detected targets disappeared after a certain time limit has expired and was not updated via tws. They since removed it a second time.
Because otherwise there’s no proof and you’re probably talking out of the side of yer mouth
nothing new isnt it
as seen in the Mig-29 thread
Did you say BOL?
Its a video game forum, not a trial.
Look, I like you Kiz. I must admit. You are actually reasonable and do weigh the evidence presented. I have seen that in your other discussions.
When you ask for additional evidence, I will make an effort to provide.
I apologize for coming off the rail regarding the use of an old manual and the logic that it should somehow apply to every MiG-29 ever. I know that it’s not a narrative you devised and continue to circulate on the forum intentionally.
I took that frustration out on you and again, I apologize.
To start off on a clean slate, stand-by. I will work on this in detail.
