Subtree no.
Just look at the United Korea Ground Force Tech Tree. Where Korea is its tech tree not separated by 2 subtrees.
2 Likes
What is with this argument on semantics and flag? There already exists a United Korea flag that was used in the Unification Talks. This is such a pointless argument to be had.
5 Likes
I just want my tanks that aren’t really tanks and ancient uparmored Soviet bricks converted into “modern” fighting vehicles. A unified tree would be fun but DPRK added to China and ROK to US or JPN would give me a reason to play those trees more
This argument has been done countless times on the forums, ROK to JPN is a culturally & politically sensitive topic not even considering the sheer lack of a bilateral alliance between them.
7 Likes
I vote no rather see a United Korean Tech Tree not a sub-tree.
7 Likes
I know this is gonna be a unpopular opinion but I prefer option 4. I rather have a merged Korea TT and have it be similar to the Israel TT. I believe that Israel only has 3 lines for its ground tree and all of its air vehicles are modification of other countries’ planes. My main argument is does China really need a sub-tree? I think Gaijin has indicated that Sub-trees will be used to bolster trees that need a sub-tree. China has enough of their own vehicles to fill most areas. Gaijin is just slow to fill those areas. As a side note, China can get more western vehicles added to its TT. I think adding those makes more sense the adding NK vehicles.
1 Like
Not really unpopular, the United Korea ground proposal has a very similar yes/no vote ratio. It’s also my preferred now, should probably edit this post a little.
1 Like
Korea doesn’t come out as a subtree
1 Like
Has anyone brought up the potentially modernized T-34-76 (1942) utilizing BK-345M HEATFS shells from the PT-76?
4 Likes
No sources given, and I’ve only heard these claims elsewhere with no sources attached either.
Unlike with the T-34-85, which doesn’t require any modifications to the gun to fire 85mm HEAT rounds, I haven’t heard of the F-34 being able to fire rounds designed for the D-56T. Although maybe someone who knows more can answer that question? Could certainly work at ~4.7 if so.
Fair enough, I suppose it would’ve been more likely if these components were already proven to be compatible by the Soviets.
Neither does the Hungarian tanks to the Italian tech tree
1 Like
I think USSR / Russia as a subtree could work. especial war current events as North Koreans and Russians are fighting together in Kursk.
Unconfirmed. But that’s besides the point with the main point being - USSR/Russia doesn’t need a subtree, it already full and still can be filled with domestic vehicles and prototypes (in the worst case vehicles from Belarus and Kazakhstan can be added). If anyone get DPRK as a subtree it is China (more so since they have Korean MiG)
4 Likes
China doesn’t need a subtree either. They have plenty of vehicles to fill the TT, Gaijin is just really slow to add them.
The F-5 was built in China and sent to DPRK, so it made sense that it was placed in the Chinese TT
3 Likes
It not forum material, so leave it
I honestly think it’ll be Iran if anything.
North Korea in-game would be really cool honestly.
2 Likes