No aim9x for the F-15s, F-16s, Apaches, Vipers?

Just answer the question. It’s a yes or no.

I get you’re a yank, but it isn’t hard to respond with a yes or no.

5 Likes

You want a yes or a no question, to something that canno be answered with a yes or no.

I am asking you about your belief.

If you believe the mica is incapable of this, then say yes.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

So yes, you can just say yes instead of being a pansy about it.


To highlight why this is folly: MICA IR is indicated capable of a 360 degree engagement envelope.

Not English, love.

1 Like

cuz then everyone would need to receive new missiles so the situation woulnt be any better for anyone. And were not ready for em either. Id much rather love a bit of decompression than new undodgeable IR missiles.

3 Likes

image
could’ve fooled me.

Unfortunately for us both, yanks are incredibly gullible and you were in fact fooled.

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Screenshot_20250625-172533_1

Im calling troll and ragebait.

@Pacifica

Sorry to bother you, but could you please check?

7 Likes

I thought the forums filtered those users out?

2 Likes

shrug

Had assumed was the case with how often it boots me for not having played. Likely would not have bothered had I checked.

5 Likes

poor usaf suffers again

1 Like

Nah, literal false flag. Check his profile.

1 Like

FIFTY FIVE YEARS??? How is that possible…???

their timestamp got zeroed which in unix is 1970.

4 Likes

it must be him, john warthunder himself!

Dude reading it was like a goddamn story 😂 tragic delusional funny I am dead why I am seeing us main asking aim120c7 for planes aim9x for planes when no one has anything near that what is up with them recently??

2 Likes

Jets don’t need them now. I don’t think that the Apaches carried them. They would be alright for the Ah-1Z as it’s pretty much a stationary target. It would give it something new so there’s a reason to play it

3 Likes