Hey. As i said just above ^
Nothing new to report.
1 Like
oops
Any news about… :P
Its still currently open.
Edit: oh I thought you meant your report :p
Well. I do want to know about that. An entire class of weapons being near unusable for 3+ months is a major problem (especially as we’ve had 2x Major updates in that time). But the second post was me just joking about the Q&A
2 Likes
also smin, when is the dev gonna change the current added vehicules of this update, consider to add to this update in the suggerstion forum list.
Its normally a week or so after if you mean the implemented list.
oh alr thanks
hey smin, how bad is the suggestions backlog
is the team overworked?
im sure the workload can be distributed by recruiting more volunteers
Its no real different to its normal timeframe. We recruit frequently throughout the year for the suggestion team.
can i know when the next recruitment period could take place?
oh and…
i got some suggestions pending since early september heh
We dont have one planned in the near future, but there will be a pinned forum announcement whenever it comes around next.
1 Like
I mean, I’ve spend days building new programs for customers that were never finished as well (and some are even in our Prod environment, unfinished). It happens, software development can be very dynamic
Seeing as the XF5U-1 wasn’t a balance addition and iirc didn’t achieve proper flight, does that mean the in game requirement for planes now allows planes that were built but never flew that don’t fill br gaps?
As long as something was built most of the way its fine, its why something like Kranvagn has a chance (COPE pls snail)
3 Likes
I’m more hoping for the F-111K and Re.2006 because both were denied for not flying (despite the later being fully built).
(Iirc they then did what gajin usually does and made the F-111C a hybrid between early and late versions instead of properly making one/two variants)
I’m still annoyed that they added the F-111C instead of the F-111K
1 Like
I’m pretty sure that DCT event vehicles might have different standards for inclusion.
2 Likes
Sounds like the CV90120 rn, it uses the 2002 model but has the engine and weight from the 2006 model, because instead of steel the devs think the Swedes used Tungsten blocks as weights to keep the vehicle from floating away but without any of the actual things that should make it weigh 35t
2 Likes