Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

That is actual cope and you are either in denial or straight of full of it. The ZA-35 is a better SPAA than the Chieftan Marksman and equal to TD role as the Falcon. The G6 is a better FV4005, the Concept 3 gives britain an actually fast light tank at a fairly good BR for Britain. The Rooikats also give britain a selection of spread out BR light tanks with great mobility. The 76mm one leaves a lot to be desired.

We can keep going on but the fact that you even suggested that the majority was worse is pure cope. Thats me leaving out the rest of the SA SPAA and air units. Regardless SA has done a lot to properly represent SA as a unique subtree while adding for the most part good and unique vehicles.

1 Like

I did say closest, they didn’t win, and the lack of care for WW2 is a big part of that. No one sub-tree did(which fuels when I call the system a failure from the start).

What are you ranking off of?
Uniqueness or competitiveness

Wow a 2A6 what a great addition pack it up @I_MiikaL_I one Leo makes it an excellent subtree

British Cope

Eh id say had Hungary air actually had unique low to mid BR air options it would’ve won, ground was sorta solid with quite a few domestic vehicles and copy and paste used to fill gaps.

1 Like

I mean the only vehicles we actually altered in the ground subtree are the Leo Marksman (missing the t55) and bt42 🫩

Gaijin you forgot the rest…
And poor sturmi

For your own criteria idk how you came to the conclusion Finland was 2nd best.

Was it needed yes but not implemented correctly so no. Was it unique no, was it a good fit, couldve been but no. Which fails all three. Especially as it didn’t fix gaps aside from 3.7 ground. Air still lacks a 5.x aircraft and only added vehicles to pre existing BR’s. Finland lacks any original content for the most part and still has yet to contribute anything meaningful to fix the BR’s

1 Like

They’ll probably sell you the Sturmi on Germany lmaom gaijin really doesn’t like Finland

Of they did a nordic subtree with only the best parts of our forces, norway and denmark it would be alright as a subtree, but gaijin is too lazy for allat

or the Patria LMUK would have been cool

2 Likes

Gotta fight Germany for Denmark considering they want us to gatekeep some stupid leopards

I don’t see the need of Brazilian stuff not related to Italy either (although until Brazil has a place in the game Xavante, EE-18 Sucuri and Guarani are welcomed), just telling why people can ask for that. Plus you can see such claims regarding other nations represented in one or few vehicles in the game and not being officially assigned to a tree, for example Turkey, Spain, Argentina, Czechoslovakia.

I forgot, the ‘all leopards for germany’ cabal still exists lol

Is that the 40mm CTA one?
Definitely looks nice with barracuda

These 3 things.

For point 1. ZA wins hand down.

For point 2. The UK could replace everything with a domestic vehicle. The only vehicle the UK needed from ZA was the Gripen.

For point 3. Iffy, but failure, I find mixed info on why but they had all ties cut from Britain and the rest of the commonwealth/west for some time.

I couldn’t care less about our Leos, id rather they just not be added until they are actually needed when vehicles like the ETS series, M41DK, M55 (SPAA) are all unique and can fill gaps thats not the full list but just a rough summary for ground.

ZA fits britain significantly more than anyone else, and it’s not even close, unless you want an african independent tree 🫩

1 Like

Also you’ll need to fight the Italians trying to claim Patria prototypes like the Patria Hitfact lol. Guess Finland probably will be the last TT, to get a Patria as a TT vehicle lmao

2A7DK would be nice since i’m a fiend for 2A7s, but i’d like more of the mid rank things, especially in the 5.7-6.7 (yes i know) bracket