goddamn it I was literally getting this picture to post it i was to slow
1 Like
I feel like I’m gonna regret looking into this, also wasn’t the entire proposal to create a light tank to better work in combination with troops what were people here even trying to classify it as instead and Sph???
It’s part of the leaks, I’d expect them to follow what naval beta was
The camo is so similar to the Australian one , but looks so much worse without the tan in it, makes sense for their region but god I hate it.
Australian Sepv3:
I think so long as it has its own mode then it should be fine. Would be a new avenue to get WW1 since a lot of the tanks currently aren’t viable in tank vs tank gamemodes so having machine gun armed tanks in a WW1 setting would work.
all I can imagine if we got infantry and tanks at BR 8.0, is well see xm800 and the Us and German SPAA committing war crimes, at least the tanks might finally be spared.
I doubt they’d be given their own mode; this is Gaijin. I can see them half-hazardly stuffing them into GRB as it’s officially “combined arms.”
Yeah this is the propaganda that the US has been pushing for a while now. It is all photo shopped.
By all intent and purpose the M10 is not a light tank. The Army even says it is not a light tank.
fair enough
Holy Jesus
2 Likes
I think i may have a comprimise.
Nation of producer just gets an [X vehicle] “export” variant where it just has the best bells and whistles implemented into the vehicle in a total but realistic package. The vehicle will possibly be fiction but realistic in depiction of a run of the mill vehicle series model
think a british hawk 200 series but we get the promised gun from the devblog (that personally stings as the reasoning for no gunpod are codswallop) or a leo 2 with the improved armour of exported models, or a fighter jet with the additional hardpoints added for an export order like the spec we see the rafale as in game as that is just an IAF rafale.
foreign nation no longer gatekeeps a better version of a native vehicle from its tree while being a dream example of peoples beloved vehicle, but also not snatching said vehicle from a fair position in another tree
1 Like
Think about it. If it truly was real it would have already been added to the game.
what in tarnation is that
1 Like
dawg nobody is going to like this
1 Like
Its a Marketing lie :P
1 Like
This literally wouldn’t work.
Example so just Because Soviet T55’s dont have better APFSDS or the smokes like the Finnish one should they all get that? Then what happens to unique vehicles in general. Should the US F-16C get all the upgrades that the F16AM on France does without any of the downsides and while at the same BR? This is just a huge bomb that doesn’t work.
2 Likes
it would be better to just pick some random export user or even prototype/testing export jet to prevent this. like a Bahrain F-16V for example.
Eh, im against it. Then we can have upgrades without debuffs. Thats a dumb idea. It should be that specific vehicle. We dont need more gripen C’s like the SAAF model getting things that they cant use.
Again SAAF gripen is MS19 not 20 it shouldn’t have GBU-39, if the equipment was compatible sure but its not. Regardless id much rather continue the current way the snail already has things going
1 Like
thats what i said. just add the actual vehicle. im sure there was a pre-production or testing F-16AM at some point. if not they can just pick one from somewhere like Jordan.
or if they can prove it (like PIDS+ on the F-16C) then just add it to the vehicle