They should be early and late variants of no.1
Why? The 341 easily fits into the partial prototype suggestion category. The guns were built and were unique, a hull was set aside and used for testing, that should be enough.
“Instead of using already produced weapons, the Rheinmetall-Borsig designers decided to use the experimental 3.7 cm Flak 341. For the main armament, twin experimental 3.7 cm (L/77) Flak 341 guns were chosen. The 3.7 cm Flak 341 (3.7 cm Gerät 341) was an improved version of the same caliber anti-aircraft gun which was developed by Rheinmetall during 1944. The development process was too slow and only four prototypes were ever built.”
I also still don’t understand how “game balance” was the reason for the Maus removal. Just leave it where it was and let everyone enjoy it. It was real and fully built.
The only removals that I completely agree with are the Panther II and KT 105, because these as they were implemented have no basis in reality. Being a Frankenstein’s Monster of multiple projects that were never meant for these vehicles.
12 Likes
I know someone might claim it for germany since they build it, but its in the same boat like the KF41.
Germany build it but not to be used by themselfs but as a export vehicle/upgrade package.
Also it was not specifficly for Thailand but for everyone who still used M41.
But since Thailand was the only nation who Trialed it and even gave it a camo it should go to them.
3 Likes
̶y̶̶o̶̶u̶ ̶k̶̶n̶̶o̶̶w̶ ̶t̶̶h̶̶e̶̶s̶̶e̶ ̶a̶̶r̶̶e̶ ̶t̶̶h̶̶e̶ ̶R̶̶u̶̶l̶̶e̶̶s̶ ̶f̶̶o̶̶r̶ ̶s̶̶h̶̶i̶̶p̶̶s̶ ̶n̶̶o̶̶t̶ ̶f̶̶o̶̶r̶ ̶T̶̶a̶̶n̶̶k̶̶s̶ ̶P̶̶l̶̶a̶̶n̶̶e̶̶s̶ ̶e̶̶t̶̶c̶
Edit: my Bad @Surbaissemaxxing , @Jarms , i was under the impression ships had their own set of suggestion rules and these where them.
Well mistakes were made and now my memory got refreshed on this Topic.
It’s not though? Even tanks are used as an example below
The last point is for ships, buddy. The rest is for all vehicles. Go read Rules, Guidelines & Tips For Creating Suggestions (Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!).
The vt4a1 in China is the Thai variant, and the vt5 can also get the grenade launcher, the mbt2000 also had fixed grenade launchers but gaijin just capped them off.
So I wouldn’t hold my breath on Japan getting a grenade launcher on theirs.
tbh I forgot about SAMs, They also operate triple starstreak launchers on 4x4s
2 Likes
Why would anyone want that?
looks at gap between Type 93 @ 9.3 and Type 81@ 11.7
Awe geez I wonder why? I’d love to kill a helicopter more than a stone’s throw away.
1 Like
since the new battle pass has chinese theme, should we expect J10b to come next update? it was leaked last year too
The Thai VT4 is not the A1 variant no? The Thai one does not have APS
1 Like
No? Thailand operates the basic VT4s without the APS (and worse armor if I am not mistaken)
2 Likes
Hi, i even have more info on it, 4 were build, in my 7,92-50mm AA Post, i also added this. There is however a problem. Cince the guns arent exactly unique to the Flakpanzer 341 as they were also for the Navy and simple infantry mounts. Which the Suggestion Mods told me makes it impossible to suggest.
1 Like
Those appear to have different designations though.
Fledermaus appears to be the naval variant while the Gerät appears to be the one for vehicle mounting.
The infantry amount appears to be a single, not twin mount.
Yeah, but its still the gun, so they dont accept it. And Fledermaus is a nickname, not a designation. At least, when i asked @WreckingAres283
Spyders AIO’s radar, Python 5, and Derby still need to be fixed. That thing has over ten pending bug reports?
4 Likes
EH the VT-4 armor is mediocre in game anyway so won’t make that much of a difference.
That sounds like the perfect top tier SAM hunter :D
1 Like