Think its more likely they may focus on nations la king 14.0’s though they could also focus on just Russia air wise next update and the rest be ground focused.
Fair enough. If the 105 can’t get flares I’d at least hope for it to be 10.0 so it doesn’t compete with tornadoes for bases
Yea well… Same goes for the F-4C and for example the Su-17M2. Those get molested as soon as anything just about farts their way as well.
It’s painful lol
Honestly most 10.0 and 10.3 vehucles without flares all suffer from not having them. I cant think of the last time a saw a F4C, that wasn’t trying to play the radar missile game to avoid most low BR IR missile fights. Or a single J35D, haven’t seen one in like 2 years. Ive seen more Mirage IIIC then most other flareless fighters, i see Q5L and F105 but probably since most people are base bombing.
March updates tend to be less groundbreaking, the big ones are usually June and December
Although did we get Hungarian air last March ?
Which was hardly groundbreaking, since all planes used old 3D models, only new textures.
True but gaijin does need to fill in the gap air wise for three of their nations considering the performance difference between those nations 13.7’s and 14.0 though imo they could fix this by increasing air to 15.0 and decompressing more than just the current rank 8
The tinfoil hat in me believes that Gaijin will ignore years old reports on vehicles if # of reports are few (1-2). While if a vehicle has numerous reports on it, then higher consideration is given to the vehicle and all of its reports regardless of how new the reports are. This also explains why new vehicles often get more attention as they rack up 10-20+ reports in a short amount of time. So if you’re tired of reports on a certain vehicle sitting around for years, continue to make other reports on said vehicles (no matter how small of an effect it may have).
Perhaps each vehicle has a threshold (like 10 or more reports open) in which the developers may give them another look over as a whole.
But I could be wildly off the mark.
Is there any updates regarding any of the Abrams bug reports that were passed like a year ago. Like are devs aware of them at all?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hn6WHPVB7r3K
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ULvSC60SVBFw
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/I9SK1Z8A6c4I
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xK4GPBS59dUL
Hello.
Developers are aware of the issues. I checked the reports and for now there are no updates, I’ve bumped all the report you sent.
Those planes still belong to singapore air force, they just deployed their for training. They may have American marking but it a requirement since they are station in American territory
You can bump reports? What effect has such?
It’s updated to be relevant to the current version (providing it’s still applicable) and refreshes the report date to the current date.
wiesel with 8 spikes!
top battle rate nightmare lol
tiger uht currently does not have this type of rockets in the game, add it please
german bell uh-1d have this type of rockets
Whatever type of rocket it is, feel free to make a suggestion report for it so it can be properly logged (if one doesn’t already exist).
@Smin1080p_WT
The current search for bug report site is pretty chaotic and inefficient, is there any plan to change the system or to make some sort of tag system like forums? I currently struggle to find any report of any vehicle as seemingly it is search purely based off term.
Could this also be bumped then please?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uWWOrR6NkADQ
Hello.
Long time lurker first time poster here so i do not know if im correct here or not and if its allowed to ping smin.
In the last passed to developers Air RB EC was a proposal.
How are the chances that we get it back, cause i really liked that mode and IF it comes back in what timeframe are we talking about? A year? Two?
Thanks