The 2S6 is fine at 10.7. Other nations just need comparable/good AA at 10.7 also.
4 Likes
it was a decompression not a standard BR change, nothing below 11.3 went up why would the 2s6?
what part isnt consistent? i think youre just making assumptions that arent true
1 Like
I don’t have Rolands, however I do have the BMP-2M. Are the Rolands worse than the BMP-2M’s proxy missile?
Other nations having gaps in their SPAA should be addressed by adding SPAAs to fill those gaps, not moving other nations SPAAs up to create similar gaps
And the Gepards have powerful 35mm cannons at 8.3, with APHE rounds, at a BR where they often fight un-stabilized tanks with far slower gun handling then the MBTS the Tunguska faces.
2 35mm APHE (which have near double the explosive filler of the ZSU-57-2 FYI) are going to do far more damage then 4 30mm AP rounds.
Yes, that 2 vehicle line up has a massive advantage… T-80B is the only TT tank at its BR, so unless you have either the T-72M2 or Obj. 292, you either need to bring up 10.3s or up tier it to at least 11.0 to bring the T-90A (which means up-tiers to the now 12.0 premium spam).
5 Likes
USSR 10.3-10.7 is miserable to play lol have you played it? you will lose 7 out of 10 matches how does it doesn’t suck
2 Likes
BR changes were exclusively for top tier, the next round of proper changes will probably be in a few months. SA-19 is perfectly fine and capable at 10.7 anyway. Not great for tank hunting, but a fairly capable air defense asset and improvised C-RAM.
OPs arguments suck.
This is much better
Funny how you claim that 2S6 is a super tank destroyer but even you didn’t do that using it
This must be rage bait you don’t even have good stats with USSR
4 Likes
That’s more of an argument for the Otomatic being far to high though, that thing could easily be 10.3/10.7, its just a 2S38 with a search radar.
1 Like
Have you ever put some thought about how much player stats effect your opinion?
Sure, he might not have the best stats because he can have multiple accounts or he could be playing more it 4fun than serious
1 Like
What usually happens is they have a bunch of sisters like me, I have four stepsisters and two stepmothers who sometimes also play with my account, which explains why some of my vehicles perform like shit bro
4 Likes
They actually affect a lot; it’s the pinnacle of War Thunder players. Let’s begin.
“Claiming that Russian tanks are super-powerful, that all you have to do is press W and Stalin will automatically guide your shots and save you.” At the same time, the people who use this argument most often have never played the USSR, and if they have, they haven’t played top-tier. And if they do play top-tier, for some reason, they don’t perform well in their vehicles. It’s funny how someone can have low performance in super-powerful vehicles? This completely refutes and invalidates Bussian Rias; it just shows a lack of skill. Instead of trying to improve their game, they go to the forum and cry.
2 Likes
1 Like
Russia has double standarts in WT, with that said, I have actually played russia up to top-tier and on each BR, I always found 1 or more absolutely broken lineup.
I would like to list the broken vehicles but I don’t remember every object :)
1 Like
You played against Soviet/Russian tanks, but which ones did you use? So you mean you don’t have any? Which top-tier Russian tanks are broken?
Allright … again
OTOMATIC — 11,3 !“!”!
2S6 — 10,7 !“!”!
by the way to those who says it is not a tank hunter. I laugh to troll all the SWE-lights and wheel tanks on that BR. It is just ordinary food for my 4x30mm because the numbers do not reflect the game reality.
But what do I know after over 20,000 battles in GRB.
1 Like
Buk is literally worse than Pantsir lmao. And the proxy on it doesnt work either atm so the big fat Buk missile have to hit you directly. If anything,Pantsir should go up to 12.7 and Buk down to 12.0. The radar is also awful,takes 7s to update it as it completes circle and things disappear from it very easily.
1 Like
Both systems absolutely belong at 12.7 — you can’t seriously claim the Buk is “worse” than Pantsir when it still outclasses almost every other SPAA at its BR.
Do you really think systems like CLAWS or Spyder are better than the Buk? Or that the Buk or Pantsir are somehow on the same level as the ELDE? Come on.
Even with the current proxy bug, the Buk still has insane missile energy, long range, high overload, and multi-target capability. The Pantsir adds absurd reaction speed and guidance accuracy on top of that. Meanwhile, NATO SPAAs at the same tier get short-range missiles or no radar lead indicators at all.
So no — moving Pantsir down or Buk lower would just make top-tier CAS completely unplayable for everyone except Russia. Both belong at 12.7, minimum.
1 Like