Yep, but I think the main reason cause Souyz OP is her bow’s armor, some skillful players I know that they will facing her bow to enemy only use turret 1and2 to fire, of course they keep long range at the sametime. In her bow there are three layers of armor, they can perfect protection for her mag 1. If I remember correctly, 280mm+230mm+20mm armors in her bow, these armors cause her very difficultly to be sink by magazine explosion . So I suggest u can try what I say in naval AB.
Picture is here : )
Honestly that one would’ve been a lot more balanced than the one we have now
That’s right, I want mention it too.
If u really see the forum, u will know what I say.
By the way, I indeed say Soyuz need to be balanced when the Dev server was opened.
230mm cemented plate or 400mm non cemented plate with inaccurate guns and 2/3rd of the explosive filler it has now
Except there’s no point discussing it in the first place, it never happened. You can argue about “soviet engineering” all you want, reality is the ship did not exist, period.
It’s a bit too easy to say “i could achieve it for sure too !” afterwards
1 Like
Yes, i did:
I also played against it. and sometimes you need to play something yourself AND against it to see how blatantly stupid it is. And whichever vehicle is dominating any gamemode (especially if its at the highest BR, because then it doesnt need to face vehicles of even higher BRs obviously) its never good for the game. Already good players will flock to it and in no time 80% of all the other vehicles are pointless to play. Now explain to me how anyone but the people abusing these vehicles profit from it? I played the scharnhorst, yes its fun, obviously if youre close to invincible and a menace on exactly the maps sizes the snail has chosen to be the only ones in naval rb. But its also boring af and not challenging at all at one point. So i basically stopped or played it very rarely after that (mainly only in naval ec)
Well fortunately (and i mean that honestly) winning vs nazi germany didnt take the ussr have a great navy.
Yeah im sure everyone is absolutely enyojing the ship out of playing the yamato or the roma or the richelieu at the moment. But as long as u dont need to “git gud” playing the soyuz its alright.
Ok lets wait till end of the month im sure the yamato will be much better then with the same armor (and same armor, splinter armor missing, giant ammo rack with like 5 times the size of the soyuz, missing splinter armor and ammo clipping through armor will absolutely slap then) It wont. as it is rn yamato could be 8.3 or 8.0 even and the soyuz 9.3. It’s literally the worst of all ships i played grinding through two whole tech trees with all ships researched and most played and spaded. It’s an absolute shipshow, easiest ship to oneshot i have ever seen.
Did they nerfed him?
But SU did have a great navy just after the war. Second best in the world FYI.
i know nothing about their post ww2 navy, but good for them. Irrelevant for the war itself but ok, they won (fortunately) without needing a good navy in ww2, thats all i wanted to say
Oh you will know when it will come to the game. Whine will gonna be impressible.
unfortunately not. they waited for 2 years leaving naval in a state where it was very hard to impossible for 70% of ships to compete with the scharnhorst and a lot of times the team with the most scharnhorst won by drawing all attention to one guy sending it into your spawn being invincible. at least it didnt have the best guns long range. Then they introduced a barbette fire mechanic that let everyone playing it that didnt have the best crew explode with one hit to the barbette before being able to extinguish almost instantly, almost at a time where stronger competetition (now) arrived anyways.
Guess which ship has all that the scharnhorst ever made strong, but also has the best guns (in accuracy with 2 others) and best shells (with neglible less pen than yamato and Roma) but with shells that have 2x and 4x the he filler respectively. Maybe you guessed right its the soyuz that will kill naval top tier worse than the scharnhorst ever could.
idc, i just wanna play a playable and at least somehow balanced game man
It is playable and balanced in some way. US and UK got best planes at 8.7 France and Germans have good too. Souyz have no good AA.
1 Like
Except one of those nations cant use the 8.7 aircraft you mention
hmmm maybe i need to try that, but then again if for every player thats not playing russia or the soyuz is to just play air rb and bomb ships (with 2 bomb drops per sortie in rb min you) then idk…i dont play naval to fly planes. but if i see a salvo of sojuz shells flying right to my bow in yamato 10 seconds after match start, i can just hold j and go next before he obviously onetaps me before i can even start turning from 10 km away. because all he has to do is hit one shell anywhere of the front half of the yamato.
Id also like to point out here that the other nations ships dont specifically need a plane to be able to stop
its also super stupid to bring a 8.7 plane as Germany, France or the UK, because you increase your BR unnecessarily
You cant bring 8.7 aircraft with 8.3 ships theres a limit in place
and even if the soyuz itself doesnt have good aa it will usually sit between like 10 enemy ships and some of them will have good aa? didnt try bombing in naval a lot tbh because i still got ptsd from their accuracy before the patch. How is the bots aa coded? do they work as if they are players with aa turned on?