ah so the same image of a simulator MFD screen as above is still the only evidence
which I already replied about how that is not exactly a great source
so you mean its because the devs feel like it?
they havent done that for much more closely related aircraft such as how F15s are missing a 30mm gunpod because despite all sources saying compatibility the only image of it was on an F15B?
ok so theres the answer MRML exists and is rated for 2 missiles, just stick it on F16 pylons 2, 3, 7, and 8
who cares about compatibility anyway
and your example is irrelevant because it shows a Mig-29N equipped with a sidewinder and is not just saying x pylon exists so put it on y
I am actually main French.
I play with almost all the nations in the game.
Several nations in the game likely received the F16V.
But I really enjoy playing with China too.
I have a lot of fun playing with the minor nations.
I grind all the minor nations (with the exception of Japan, which I’m grinding now) before grinding my first main nation, which is the US.
((I’m researching the f16CM right now, actually).
Yes, I fiercely defend China and Israel because they are the most wronged in the game
1 Like
There are also renders of the Bulgarian F16V.
Edit:
To be honest, it’s a common render, it’s an advertisement commonly used by Lockheed.
But it’s still listed on the Lockheed Martin website.
Huge false equivalence fallacy.
It is no where close to F-15C MRMLs.
Didn’t you claim they were real? Now you’re claiming they’re fake…
Su-34 was not mentioned.
Flanker is one airframe type, Su-34 is the only other airframe made post-2000 besides Su-57.
So yeah, your posts are claiming MRMLs are fake by lying about other real missile racks with equivalent evidence.
where did I mention F15 or MRML?
yes and no, it is a broader category, but there are differences within it
and notably Su-35 has undergone both significant structural modifications, and significant avionics upgrades compared to the aircraft in game
again provide proof of any of the three configurations I mentioned, because there arent even photographs of them on the ground or digital renders
Your posts alluded to it by mentioning other multi-rail missile mounts brought into the game using the same exact standard.
You’re talking about Su-34, which is a new airframe.
Su-35 is just wider wings & new electronics; said electronics were implemented into Su-30SM, Su-30MKM’s 2019 refit, etc. & wingspan doesn’t matter.
F-111C has wider wingspan & new electronics over F-111A, that doesn’t make F-111C a different airframe.
& F-111F is newer with shorter wings than F-111C, that doesn’t make them different airframes.
Photos of dual pylon R-77s & MRMLs are all over the forums…
Edit removed some off-topic rambling.
