Does that mean it was in the f14 only? What’s its range?
also intended for F-18, and potentially could be used by others
range was at least 100nm (185km) because that was the requirement, but true max range is unknown
1 Like
IIRC ACIMD was tested but AIM-152 program was not
4 Likes
kinematically. as far close to medium range? its called a NEZ for a reason.
Not even really tested.
1 Like
made bug report on r-77 lacking maneuverability. If this goes through, would it be more maneuverable than mica above 0.6 mach?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/t87egJpsGQUk
1 Like
50 gs for rocket itself, 12 gs target overload
mach 5
Pulled mach 5 from?
which missile is this for
r-77, was responding to mrkrabpattys
1 Like
also maybe r-27ea may have existed?
Spoiler
1 Like
There were at least 8 test firings of R-27EA in 1985-1986 on MiG-29 №970 and 971 from what i can gather. And “Agat” kept working on a seekerhead after the project was canned in favour of R-77 on their own. But that’s the best i could find.
youre talking of r27a not ea
1 Like
That is IF there was A and EA. If only one version of active R-27 was ever considered - there wouldn’t be a reason to have any additional abbreviations in a name and it would be R-27A regardless of what motor was installed in a missile.
France with meteor as well
that doesnt sound particularly realistic
why?
max range is 125km