They’re going to give R-73s to the Yak-141, but not the MiG-29A stuck with R-60Ms, while the F-15A moves down to 12.7 to terrorize 11.7 jets.
Okay then.
7 Likes
still better than nothing.
Notive how even in this case 141 will get R-73s only in the next major (probably a month ot two away), while F-15s will go down with br changes.
Even I’ll have that F-16 soon. And I had relatively low activity.
is this the rwr interface being displayed on the right mfd in this picture?
i think it is rwr + situational awarness / DL
1 Like
True, maybe displaying something for the MAW and LWS systems
Since this pic is from the mig-35
Iirc that’s a nav display, you can see something similar on 25BM’s right MFD in game.
9 Likes
Italy mentioned :)
E’ finita…
We got F-104 Salsa br reduction before R-73s on a MiG-29
3 Likes
Still no ASA M :'(
2 Likes
France mentioned :)
C’est fini…
Woulda said c’est la fin but works too
2 Likes
Not that different from Italian, it would be “E’ la fine” lol
1 Like
I have a more important question
Spoiler
How do you cook your spaghetti
Spoiler
Water on the stove, pinch of salt, let water boil, throw in the spaghetti and let it cook until “al dente”, never overcooked cuz it turns into mush :)
1 Like
Spoiler
Agree, al dente is the best
1 Like
9 Likes
Wrong. Lol the graph & manual is the early 9.12 & is not even in game.
The manual and graph you so confidently wave around is entirely irrelevant to 9.12A, 9.13 & 9.12G.
Simply learn how to read and understand the definition of static thrust at sea, standard day. When you figure it out, read the MiG-29G manual.
The MiG-29G is not an initial production 9.12. It is equipped with series two RD-33’and it tells you exactly what the take-off thrust is.
This is not difficult & requires minimal reading comprehension. You do not need a degree to comprehend this stuff. Again, here is the textbook definition of what Static thrust @ sea, standard day means & how its specifically listed in the MiG-29G manual.
The manual goes even further to hold your hand and describes both RD-33 as they sit installed the aircraft.
"They are equipped with “variable air intakes”.
Refer to the above.
8,300 kp is the take-off thrust for each RD-33 (installed). It would not be take-off thrust if it was uninstalled. War Thunder fails to model Take-off thrust. That is why all of you hilariously believe forward movement is the only way to determine any thrust rating. As if there is no such thing as a baseline rating for safety. As if the engine cannot compress air on its own lol.
The MiG-29G is 1:1 thrust ratio fighter…
Anything lower would not make it a 1:1 TWR fighter…
That is why all of you illogically believe that forward movement is the only thing that can determine any thrust rating. As if there is no such thing as a baseline rating for safety during TAKE-OFF. Which is honestly the funniest piece of disinformation I have heard on the forum in a long time.
Oh really???
Feel free to share any documentation you have that allows Manufacturers to publish their flight manuals with uninstalled thrust of the engines from their vendors.
Well, I have plenty of FAA & DoD regulations stating the exact opposite. That they will never allow thrust ratings to be posted without correction factors applied for installation unless specifically stating so.
Do you kind of understand why it may be somewhat important to have an established baseline thrust that is guaranteed by manufacturer? Maybe when you are trying to take off with a bunch of people on board??
You made this up.
10%??? All that thermal/kinetic energy just poof gone?
Yeah, no… This the year 2026. We have already long ago achieved ideal thrust in fighter applications & have practically eliminated all losses imposed by airframe integration with nozzle design.