You can’t conduct polite discussion, you’re here to bait and troll and you’ve done a terrific job of derailing the thread. Please leave.
6 Likes
Can’t even try to get an accurate fm for the mig29 without it being russian mains crying. Meanwhile the f16 is a completely ahistorical ufo…
Yes I am, when I am done doing this bug report I’ll answer to you.
Anyway I’m pretty sure I gave you a physical explanation on why that would happen (or at least why the MiG29 wouldn’t be slower). Effective airflow is the airflow at he end of the wing, and, as the air NEEDS to be deflected downwards to produce lift, effective airflow is tilted a bit compared to relative airflow.
Instead of writing this I suggest you spend some time reading this: Lift-induced drag - Wikipedia
1 Like
He’s only here to pester you and everyone else, you’re feeding him grade A entertainment by responding.
1 Like
Yeah I know, at least if he reads something about aerodynamics he may troll using actual physics lol
You gave me a physical explanation according to your physics, which you yourself admitted was wrong in that thread. Forgive me if I’m not slightly sceptical of other claims you make afterwards. More interesting is how @MiG_23M keeps interjecting into that thread with toddler-level understanding of physics saying how mass doesn’t influence missile top speed at all. I’m sure even you can concede he’s wrong on that point?
I’ll answer you in the other thread later, I won’t answer anymore to any non MiG-29 related post you make here
If you actually believe the trite you’ve been posting, then technically the mig29 FM is wrong and increasing fuel should increase top speed. It doesn’t. Is that not relevant to this thread?
Mass is totally irrelevant to the very out of context discussion you’re referencing. Pinging me to drag that discussion over to this thread simply because I won’t entertain you over there isn’t going to work.
@Giovanex05 ignore him, no further replies. Just need to have mods handle it since he’s unable to self-correct his behavior.
1 Like
An established turn is a turn in which equality is observed. Thrust=Resistance, Lifting force multiplied by the cosine of the turn angle minus the weight is zero
First, you need to test with a fuel weight of 1500 kg. Second, the game files indicate most likely 2 overloads.One for a local coordinate system the other for a speed one
wasn’t 20min 1500kg? Also what do you mean to local and speed coordinate system?
No, you have indicated 2400 kg, but it should be 1500. These are the coordinate axes. One is connected to the axes of the aircraft.Another with a velocity vector
I have always stated I am NOT an expert on the matter, quit lying and derailing the thread.
For someone who claims as much you’ve proven you’re not very well read in the matter regardless.
2 Likes
I know, but it doesn’t have overloads for sea level, and turning at 200kt at 1000m is too hard without a stick… doing a 500kph test now at 1000m though.
You can adjust fuel weight in test flight with the dev commands in localhost… will share more on this when I’m home later.
1 Like
his element is the speed of 600+ km/h
Ny=(Y+P*sinAoA)/mg
a comparison can be made using the russian manual