if you need to discuss a picture, politics or F-15 kill to death ratios go in another thread, write here if you want to discuss something about the MiG29
Yes I am, when I am done doing this bug report I’ll answer to you.
Anyway I’m pretty sure I gave you a physical explanation on why that would happen (or at least why the MiG29 wouldn’t be slower). Effective airflow is the airflow at he end of the wing, and, as the air NEEDS to be deflected downwards to produce lift, effective airflow is tilted a bit compared to relative airflow.
You gave me a physical explanation according to your physics, which you yourself admitted was wrong in that thread. Forgive me if I’m not slightly sceptical of other claims you make afterwards. More interesting is how @MiG_23M keeps interjecting into that thread with toddler-level understanding of physics saying how mass doesn’t influence missile top speed at all. I’m sure even you can concede he’s wrong on that point?
If you actually believe the trite you’ve been posting, then technically the mig29 FM is wrong and increasing fuel should increase top speed. It doesn’t. Is that not relevant to this thread?
Mass is totally irrelevant to the very out of context discussion you’re referencing. Pinging me to drag that discussion over to this thread simply because I won’t entertain you over there isn’t going to work.
@Giovanex05 ignore him, no further replies. Just need to have mods handle it since he’s unable to self-correct his behavior.
An established turn is a turn in which equality is observed. Thrust=Resistance, Lifting force multiplied by the cosine of the turn angle minus the weight is zero
