i just want a naval fighter than can use fox3s for ussr.
3 Likes
Sick of premiums tbh
2 Likes
You accidentally answered an old question of mine right here… I’ve been looking for info on the Malaysian Mig-29N and never found anything.
2 Likes
https://www.angelfire.com/pe/yujin/fulcrum02.html
Looks right enough just from a quick google search on history of the Malaysian 29
They could add 9-13S at 13.0 without R77 but with R73 and not only would it not change the game at all, but it makes sense to do so. The soviet tree needs a flight worthy MiG29 with R-73. The Germans have one, given the recent BR changes, the soviets should now.
they should have from the start
here, another shameless plug from my side
3 Likes
would require a new radar tho not sure how different the N019M on the S model is from the base N019s on the normal migs are.
would be a insta buy for me tbh, also would be nice to have to get me through the yak line of the ussr air tree
i wish they just added a smt without the fatass spine on its back, it definitely exists
2 Likes
19M isn’t that much better. It’s differences would be similar to things like different APG 68 variants.
Maybe more range and slightly better tracking but nothing crazy
1 Like
theres no 9.19 without the fat spine? all pics of smt without the spine i can find are 918
1 Like
no the closest is the 9.18 variant which is the same as the 9.19 SMT except the fat spine
1 Like
And i do not believe the 9.18 gets the extra CMs the 9.19 gets.
So ya trade the spine + some CMs for the better FM
1 Like
would the cms on the 29m (9.15) ( the 1990s one) be single or double pop
in real life?: up to what the pilot chooses like on every other plane
in war thunder?: up to what gaijin chooses
SPO-15. L-150 is 9-19R
1 Like
Aye, im back, the dude who keeps making bug reports on the MiG-29 high on copium.
I took a break from this game, and i came back just today to analyze F-16’s performance as i thought that it was hilarously overperforming at high AoA and instantaneous turn rate;
I started investigating and putting equations together to find a discrepancy only to realize that its performance and drag matches the info and mathematic analysis that i did;
To summarize, the higher the lift of the wings, the higher the induced drag. I can’t be bothered to write the equation here altho it isnt complicated. After that, i decided to check out the MiG-29 to see that it produces TWICE the amount of drag for 8 degrees less of pull @ 671 km/h. To be clear, 42585 kgf of drag, 24.4 °/s, and 22° AoA, which is absurd considering the MiGs small size and weight. To put on perspective, thats the same ammount of drag the Su-27SM produces at that same speed, a way bigger plane.
I immediately started reverse engineering to see what was up and, considering the lifting body the MiG-29 has, it needs to pull 17Gs (~51°/s) at 671km/h and produce ~221 TONS of lift to reach such an ammount of drag with the Lift Coefficient obtained from the Drag Coefficient. Beyond absurd.
Ill start gathering info about this, but i have a theory. The MiG-29 manual has a Max Obtainable G-Load chart, and my theory is Devs squeezed the performance of the MiG to meet that limit and completely forgot to change the drag to match both coefficients, which would explain the laughable energy bleed.
Ill sniff another tank of copium and see how this thing goes.
13 Likes
no HMD 120s, vs HMD R-77s and R73s. looks fair enough to me lol