Yeah, sure, more confirmation will be welcome
It has been slightly overperforming after Oswald was tuned to 0.63 from 0.62 back in November 2023 when I reported an also slight (but more important than this one since it was at lower altitude) underperformance at low speed sea level. The report was addressed as not a bug but the slight adjustment was made to fix it.
A and ADF models are. When I reported it thought, after multiple times, they just said “we don’t adjust slow speed rate” Community Bug Reporting System
I compared F-16C-40 to the chart and it aligned very well with the data shown, I think it is probably quite accurate but may be for a heavier model of MiG-29 as I was testing the 9-12A.
If I test the 9-13 and others it aligns itself even better to the data.
Bug report:
MiG-29SMT N010M (Zhuk-M) radar missing ability to slew ACM box:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RUx6kICKfGLH
MiG-29SMT N010M (Zhuk-M) radar missing PDV search mode:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9FZpEygOgE82
Anyone who speaks Russian can explain what this stands for?
I think it refers to detecting stationary sea targets, but I’m not clear on what this is supposed to stand for:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180228114953/http://www.phazotron.com/produktsiya-i-uslugi/
Most likely:
Measuring coordinates of stationary land (sea) targets
Thanks
I suppose it’s abbreviated from “наземные (морские) цели”
Bug report:
MiG-29SMT N010M missing ability to detect stationary targets:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/a2vQRCKiiS8g
Yes.
It would be more correct (fixed targets for example tank/ship)…
Stationary ones are, for example, the Voronezh Radar…
Further in the text _ Selection and tracking of ground (sea) moving targets…
Maybe in English, but not in Russian…
In Russian:
I know that in Russian it is different.
idc what is better or worse
just please add a new MiG-29 version, its been over a year since the last new version of the 29 was added (29G and SMT, I will not count the 29B as a seperate version to the A)
MiG-29M (9-15 or 9-41), MiG-29K or MiG-35
but please just something man
Will giving Soviet a Premium MiG-29 would solve the terrible FM problem? Lol
A mig29 with 15% more powerful engines and fbw while being Just a bit heavier than the 9.13 would be considerably better than what we have rn
Really? I didn’t know.
Is it a different engine completely or a modified version?
It gets the rd-33k which has like 10% more thrust compared to rd-33 and a considerable amount of other improvements Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29M (9-15) - what the fulcrum would have been
Sounds pretty cool thanks
Reverse psychology: Just give the US a MiG-29 premium (the FM gets changed with the release of the 90$ pack)
