Chart implies that from 400 km/h + at 3G it should accelerate, but 3.88G at 470km/h it is stabilized…
Should not stop accelerating at 3.88G until ~1450 km/h based on the chart.
Clearly it is missing a lot of energy.
Chart implies that from 400 km/h + at 3G it should accelerate, but 3.88G at 470km/h it is stabilized…
Should not stop accelerating at 3.88G until ~1450 km/h based on the chart.
Clearly it is missing a lot of energy.
I would say a very lot

At an instrument speed of 950 km/h
Performing a U-turn at full afterburner with an overload of 6G, the aircraft adds 20 km/ h in 1 second
Altitude and weight for test?
2000m 13000 kg

According to this schedule, the aircraft is able to climb vertically up to a height of 1 km
At the same time accelerating
During this test I was able to accelerate to 970 km/h in 1.11 seconds in a 6G turn at 2000m. This seems accurate, but at lower speeds it does not. Likely has correct optimal speed thrust but incorrect static thrust.
Let’s slow down, let’s say 700km/h
700 km/h and 6G U- Turn?
yes, according to the schedule, you should continue overclocking, but slower
It is practically at a standstill, unable to accelerate beyond 700 km/h at 6G. In fact, I think it decelerates unless I am slightly losing altitude.
let’s slightly raise the speed to 800 km/h
MiG-29 versus Mirage 2000: personal account from Air Marshal Harish Masand
In a turn towards the Mirage, I found we were crossing even 90 degrees before the Mirage. Also, I had noticed, while practicing for the displays, that the 29 accelerated even at 9g at low-levels if the power was ahead of the onset of g and, therefore, required a coordinated turn with power management to stay at the optimum speed and at the desired g.
At low fuel amounts (MiG-29 burns much faster) It is already possible to accelerate at 9G and to beat the Mirage 2000 in some turns, but it is hard to determine the performance from pilot accounts.
Passing 800 km/h it accelerates to 820 km/h in ~1 second at 6G, 2000m.
So there is a shortage of traction below 800km/h
Yes it seems so, it is also difficult to accelerate in regions 0 - 1000m in vertical even at speeds of 0.5 mach. This is hard to test, though… since you often exceed 1000m before finishing your pitch-up maneuver.
I have already written that the thrust is not calculated correctly. That’s why we have such a failure
Are you going to write to the devs on the Russian forum or make a report?
I wrote that there is a shortage of traction. Not an error closed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/REhVqnRqta0v