Well at least there is still hope.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7Qe6XEG8XeF7?comment=Jpq6xuwg8RCWc5TH1XmOS0lV
Mig-29K to be a nothing burger
1 Like
another day of 9.15 and 9.41S being confused
2 Likes
Tbf the 156 Mig-29 9.15 (the one in-game) did use the rd33mk eventually in life.
So if they give it rd33mk it’s not unhistorical
afaik it was never the MK that powered 156 it was just a RD-33 modified with the OVT nozzles
although 154 was powered by the MK later in its life under the MiG-35
Nah it was rd33mk
From Maks 2011
2 Likes
@Saprano_2132 does the MiG book you have give a izdeliye number to the MiG-29M2 MRCA built from the 4th 9.15 prototype?
Seems like it’s just
“MiG-29M2 No.154”
2 Likes
not nothing burger anymore
1 Like
Poor 9.15, will forever be mistaken for 9.41/47…
1 Like
Man im in love with plane, despite slight uptier it performs amazing.
Shame people passes on this beauty due to previous Mig’s performance.
In case anyone want to use it here is the user camo link.
1 Like
MiGuys, help me.
Do I do it…
Do I spend 80 something dollars for a true, ungimped Fulcrum, unlike what Gaijin has given us
2 Likes
Ungimped Fulcrum in a world where everyone has Fox-3s and fully digital avionics?
3 Likes
yes.
fuck it we ball.
3 Likes
is there ANY more or less modern Redfor aircrafts? Outside of mods.
@ron_23 was just showing me and uh…
We get the JF-17.
… And also the F-16C on the redfor side sometimes.
3 Likes
Brother craves for forbidden heat signature.
1 Like
DCS MiG-29 sucks sorry
Besides Jeff, Su-27 module (simplified) includes a J-11 with R-77s.
7 Likes
Would the 9-31 model out perform the 9-41 model in flight performance? As far as I can tell the 9-31 is a Mig29m but with the naval wings and engines of the 41?
Correct me if I am wrong