Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 1)

As i said i doubt that Gaijin will take this very specific configuration and just take the one that was “planned” in the 90s
Only stretch that might be possible is 27M getting PESA Bars with 4 DL channels becaue it was tested back in the 90s and because there is little to no data on N011 with slotted dish

we can get multiple 27m variants… like how MiG-21S (R-13-3000) is in game

That’s a legacy premium, you know gaijin, they constantly switch the rules

su27m (710) as premium

  • gaijin

Oh no

they will probably only add the 711 and that as an even vehicle ontop of that

given how they added mig29m as squadron when Su-33 LITERALLY EXISTS AS SAME ALREADY, it might actually happen

711 more popular

iam thinking that they are adding the 29M as a squadron so that they can add the 29K or 35 into the tech tree

2 Likes

but worse and boring

what will 29k have over it

carrier spawn etc…

trust

dawg…,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,…,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,…,…,.,.,.

well it has the revised wings so it might turn better

MiG-29KR to get drag chute researchable drag chute mod?
image

naval aviation aura will be its advantage
image

1 Like

With R-27EA or, god forbid, Novator KS-172 as the main selling point

that has thrust vectoring, right? air to air buk lmao

r27ea wont be as op as people might think tho

well specifically, i desire to have an orb on an flanko thats not at 14.0+ - and if thats not reasonable(i dont know much about those models), then i desire some russian bias to be mixed in to make it possible lmao

Su-27SM3 would be a good 14.0