Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 1)

can you send full? I think i dont have it

iam certain that you dont have those docs, i fished them out of the german archives
those are east german pilot training manuals or the litteral translation “Study materials”

Studienmaterial.- “Die Gefechtseigenschaften des Jagdflugzeuges MiG-29” von Oberst Prof. Dr. sc. mil Dr.-Ing. Siegfied Meindl und Oberst Doz. Dr. sc. mil. Joachim Klopfer

Studienmaterial.- “Visiersysteme der Jagdflugzeuge MiG-23 ML und MiG-29” von Oberst Dr. rer. mil. Heinz Sauerbier

the second one is what i used for my mig-29 hud reports 6 months ago…
ig there arent any tech mods that dare to touch german sources for aircraft

Spoiler

image

1 Like

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AY36YgzxQT5f
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3FVRHjgWtt8i

it’s the one of sources that I was using for my old mig-29 gimbal limits report, it’s why I thought mig-29 gimbal was 65/65 for azimuth, 56/36 for elevation and not 70/70 for azimuth and 60/40 for elevation

I was thinking about working on the HUD, but I have a more detailed and simpler description in Russian in the book I sent, so a German one is probably unnecessary.

Also, I’d say that HUD reports should be done something like this:

  1. A screenshot of the HUD mode from the game.
  2. A description of everything that’s wrong with it and how it should be.

Making one report for each feature when the HUD as a whole isn’t accurate is extremely inconvenient.

1 Like

thats how it was done for the rafale

and so i was told is the better way to report that stuff

not like reporting multiple issues at once will change that they will sit in accepted hell for over half a year
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EljNegnDJ53F

I think it’s a typo and they meant ±2.

What’s +2? Then I’d write ±1.

already report it, linked

I think the HUD there was generally okay, and only a few features were missing.

So, the new stuff needed to be added to the old stuff. But here, it seems like a complete rebuild is needed.

well i was told before that i need to split up one report on the F-18 hud into 2 by a contnet creator that passed them to a tech mod

these two reports were a single one originally

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bIIZrmu9JflR
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UTAUzW98dxKj

i made for reports about the F-18 hud and cockpit
and that was the only one that wasnt accepted

so i didnt want to take the chance that it wont be accepted just because its 10 or so issues in a single report

Okay, I formatted it differently. I’ll think about how to do this.

1 Like

vids from youtube
hello rafale tuning

1 Like

pretending 500kg of remaning fuel is 50% fuel

2 Likes

@kizvy
Mig-29M cockpit is already modeled

13 Likes

damn, does it mean we have chances to have it this update

So they went with 156 cockpit.


155 and 156 cockpits
Also technically means that 9.15 should not get HMS, because there are no tracking modules installed

6 Likes

peak.
one day they can upgrade to ovt i believe

Not chances, it is coming this update.

Of course the picture doesn’t show the RWR 🤣

RIP no HMD
higher BR than Su-30MKK btw

Was it 156 only that didn’t have that installed?