Mig-29SMT:
Mig-29N:
4 Likes
one is 9.17 the other is 9.13
sorry i didnt read all the way. 9.17 was upgraded to 9.19.
*technically 9.12 external with some 9.13 insides
9.17 was the first SMT attempt but got shelved and with several drawbacks (the dorsal spine extended too long it even blocked the upper airbrake, although later they did install a new airbrake onto revised spine with similar end piece to 9.15), 9.19 is the SMT we all familiar with today.
you might hate me for this but i think the UB was the better option
3 Likes
no radar
no radar missiles
worse flightperformace and less fuel
while probably being heavier as well
Looks cool
3 Likes
9.0 mig-29 when??
11.3 if they only give it the r-60m
1 Like
misread as no missiles in the original post
Do all ub have no radar ?
they dont
why do you think the nose looks completly different
Yeah…that’s a bad idea. Better ask for 29KUB
or even better
Mig-35
also it has no countermeasures and im kinda impressed the mig29ub suggestion on this website managed to gloss over this crucial detail
Gaijin doesn’t believe in existence of Fulcrums based on MiG-29M airframe
since you mentioned that I never noticed that before,
MiG-29UBT 9.52 could be interesting too, but only 2 was ever build, still no radar but you did get CM comp with it (on 2nd prototype)
1 Like
Im looking at the MMRCA MiG-35 #154 (the one based on the 9.15 airframe) it lacks the normal 16/32 dispensers found on the normal 9.41/61 airframes, but it features the planned mounts from the 9.15s with having it mounted inside the spine. So it appears it doesn’t have any CM mounted in its current configuration but if it was to come to the game would it get the underside CM mounts or the spine mounted CMs?
pics:
