Thats true to a certain extent.
That is why serial numbers & or a 24-bit ICAO address are great OR the RF No. That is literally on the side of the Mig-29 9-13S you misidentified as well as the R-27R (a missile you also misidentified) that is attached to it in a static display in Russia.
Be that as it may, Ukrainian missiles similar to R-27ER were supplied to Poland and Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan in fact MU1 have the official name MiG-29 (9-13)…
I do not think that the leadership of the game will curiously consider these nuances…
9-13 Late and point forward into the game.
There was ET lying next to it.It is not necessary to look at the number of the RF. And the serial number of the aircraft
I do disagree, though it’s a reasonable conclusion you have.
My reasons:
GJ does care especially about Soviet History, because they did not give the ER to the Mig-29 9-13 at release & had no intention of doing so until game efficiency was an issue.
That means that decision can always be revisited.
Also, if Gaijin Entertainment ever wants to release a Soviet Mig-29 9-12. They are going to have to reevaluate the R-27ER. The only way they can do that is without the R-27ERs.
Lastly if, GJ ever wants to decompress or lower BR of the 9-12A & regular 9-13 they will need to evaluate removing the ER. It will increase historical & technical reality that the game is supposed to be known for & will allow these aircraft to operate under better game efficiency. The reason the GJ gave the 9-12A & 9-13 the R-27ER in the first place.
They can always give the R73 which was their initial plan before release.
The R-27ER helped increase the game efficiency at release until now. After next update the R-27ER will have the opposite effect. It will keep the 9-12 & 9-13 too high to compete against modern fighters with better radars, many more active missiles, more SARHs, more IR missiles with more countermeasures per loadout.
The ER will also hold back the 9-13S from coming to the game with ER & R-77 compatibility. The BRs at the top will be compressed as well & the Mig-29 will suffer.
It has an R27R on its wings. I can care less what’s next to it or not. Its already a (9-13S)
If you have a problem with the Russian Aviation Photo Team you can email the guy right now. He is in Russia & his name is [FoxbatRU]
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29S (9-13S) - Russia - Air Force | Aviation Photo #2067445 | Airliners.net
He has taken himself 3.5k photos of Soviet & Russian aircraft commercial, civil & military. He documents & writes about their history. These individuals are of a community that has documented aircraft as a hobby longer than most of you have been born. Many come from backgrounds in aerospace industries & air forces around the world. Show some respect.
Message him if you believe the Mig-29 9-13S he photographed & documented in Krymsk Russia - December 2011 is not a true 9-13S.
No source, made up
The seeker and other components are identical. It can utilize the same channels or frequencies as the standard R-27R because they are identical seekers, guidance unit, warhead, autopilot, datalink, etc. The only change is the booster. Quit making stuff up.
Prove it.
Please show a Mig-29 with an unmodified N019 Rubin & the R-27ER.
This needs not to drag on. I already know you do not agree, nor can you prove it. I already explained it, sourced & linked what I can share.
I do not have to prove to you something that does not exist in reality & history, but only does so in video games. The burden of proof is on you to show me where this video game reality you hold near & dear exist.
There are different versions in Yemen…6 pieces 9-18…in the first photo from above…
What are the chances of them getting into the game?
You have the burden of proof, not me. You have refused to acknowledge the very real evidence shown to you already and under no circumstances will you address my question.
I have to prove to you that video game reality is real? Thats not how it works kiddo.
You are the one who thinks vido game reality is true. Not me, not even GJ lol. They only added the missile to the 9-12 & 9-13 for game efficiency they literally said this.
Burden of proof is on you not us.
@ZVO_12_INCH has provided some awesome interesting info in the Ukrainian R-27s. They utilize modified seekers. Vympel cut them off.
Just in case, the register of Moldovan MiG-29…9-13 were sold to Yemen…
It’s not 9-13S.
High I guess. These will be very nice premiums.
MiG-29S (9-13S) located after MiG-29 (9-13) or in folder with MiG-29SMT (9-19) ?
I predict that in the future Yemen MiG-29SMT might be aircraft premium pre-order pack in rank 9 for russia
I guess MiG-29S (9-13S) it might own 4th gen fighter aircraft after MiG-29 9-13
in a folder with the 9.13 would be the way to go tbh
2015_MIG-29 - TABELA.zip (157.9 KB)
2015_МиГ-29-Польша_25 Лет под красно-белым знаком.zip (3.2 MB)
Hey ZVO, any ideas on Mig-29 from Bulgarian, are those planes get any upgrades ?
Do you know any information about former 9-12B operators like Bulgarian, Slovak and Polish.
