No narcissist, that is called anecdotal evidence, just like everything else that comes from your mouth that you swear is the word of God.
You’re saying a lot of stuff I didn’t say, on purpose. It doesn’t support your argument.
I have primary sources for the R-73 and its’ performance. They disagree with the idea that it’s underperforming. I have primary sources for the magic 2 and AIM-9L that suggest they are underperforming.
As you can see, I’ve reported the ones that needed fixed. I’ve been reporting issues with the MiG-29 that had sufficient information backing them to make a report.
I’ve done testing to ensure the MiG-29 follows all of the available graphs, schedules, etc. I provided sources for you to test the MiG-29s performance. This thread is about the MiG-29. I suggest you move this argument to my R-73 thread or to the IR missiles thread if you want to continue rambling on about something from which you have no source or valid reason to make assertions.
Have a good night.
Yeah I agree, the Magic II is irrelevant here bud. Bringing it up is nothing more than another plea for attention and to make it all about you.
Everything has to be about you. I do not care about your thread, I don’t care about your youtube channel of custom battle matches with your sister. It is all anecdotal evidence that took place months ago.
Again, if you have so much of an issue with anyone stating the IRCCM is lacking and the R73 is underperforming lately,
please address those directly that provided the more detailed analysis.
1 Like
Where did you find the inner FoV for the R-73?
1 Like
DM’d you about it
The biggest problem isn’t irccm so much as flares just overperform like a mf.
1 Like
It will be hard to tailor all missiles to have correct flare resistance since every nation irl used various different flares. It’s not so much that they overperform… rather they are all the same and missiles adjusted accordingly.
There have been no recent changes to the rangeBands correlated to countermeasures resistance for the R-73, Magic 2, or AIM-9M. I am not a game developer, just an ordinary player like the rest of us who has access to and chooses to read the datamine and understand what the values in the game files mean. It helps me keep a clearer and unbiased opinion.
1 Like
Absolutely irrelevant. They have buffed CM performance and reduce it before for certain missiles. This is nothing more than another “trust me bro, I am a developer” comment.
It seem your missile choosing the hotter man (which is me) and go right in my six lol well i’m not even mad it understandable that sometimes missiles will pickup the closest IR signature instead of enemy it happen with any IR missile
2 Likes
Well said.
Yeah, I tried to play the Yak the other day because I missed it and was immediately yeeted. You cannot preflare as much in soviet aircraft because you only have so many compared to the F-16C, Barak II and F14B.
They are at a great disadvantage just on CM alone. Not just flight performance. BTW has anyone flown the B model Tomcat lately? I was smashing 29Gs and definitely the SMT in 1v1s last night. The Tomcat has insane alpha when supersonic and wings fully swept.
I suppose since it is the only aircraft in the world that can hit 7gs while flying Mach 2. but still, the Mig29 SMT should be able to do much more at transonic flight. It’s a bus compared to the B Model at all speeds. Definitely does not have a roll rate like a fully fueled and loaded aim54 Tomcat. Something is definitely off.
yes, the 29smt model is bad. even the f4 can screw me over as on the lead we immediately turn and try to hit each other with the cannon. Practically my pilot falls asleep all the time and I can’t do anything except run away. I feel that the 29smt is only suitable for flanking or attacking unsuspecting targets. At least that’s what I do.
I am a normal air rb player and not some pro player who plays 1v1 and unknowns.
1 Like
SMT loses to an F-14A in dogfights, it is in a pathetic state. If you wanna try it out feel free to invite me to a 1v1 to test
There is no way in hell this dude is going to tell me the SMT is far superior at turning in Air RB than the G because they have a screen shot of them in test flight min fuel and clean.
What does flying with no weapons and infinite min fuel mean to any of us?
Cannon kills are far rarer than flying aircraft like the Mig29G and F-16C, Barak, and F14B. The SMT gets caught by any of these in a 1v1 75% you are screwed, jumps up to 90% if you are out of R73s and have over half fuel.
Imagine if it did not have HMS and the R73? I am actually more efficient in the SMT than the G because I rarely place myself in danger and must flank far out and ambush with R73s, and R27ETs then run for my life. That is exactly what most of us who actually play the jet do. Unsuspecting targets like you say. Now the R73s and R27s love to go for any flares and friendlies. It’s like GJ is actively trying to hinder this jet every time we figure out a tactic to make it work.
If this dude was to rush in there every time (that’s all he knows, trust me) he would have a pathetic KD in it. Thats why he refuses to play it more than 20 games. He would say things like “I will refuse to play it untill GJ fixes it.”
Wait… He did say that already LFMAO aint that right @MiG_23M?
Lol he blacklisted me so I can’t look at his stats anymore.
SMT wrecks everything in BVR. It’s funny how you never mention that.
3 Likes
I never blacklisted you, we’re still friends in-game.
Can always check here or click on my name to see how many battles I’ve done this month or whatever too.
It doesn’t.
In BVR? Of course, it only has 2 rockets, which you can easily avoid by turning around or flying close to the ground :)
4 Likes
Which is true of all radar missiles, the complaints about the R-27ER aren’t really warranted until they fix multipathing.
1 Like
Only two of the best SARH in game by a country mile.
2 x 0 = 0
The missile is easily defeated like any radar missile. Especially with the new RWR mechanics.
1 Like