My sources are the same as yours (came to me in a dream). You want a source for my hot takes now and you don’t want to provide any for yours?
Interesting.
2 Likes
Keep it up. Boast about it more.
Being as it is difficult to strip you of the tools used to dive into the files you have no license to acknowledge or record. There is only very limited options available.
It’s just the dev server, which anyone can download.
Tech mods share when stuff has been actioned internally all the time.
I’m not an official, so feel free to take anything I’ve said with a grain of salt. I could be lying for all you care. (You’ve said you don’t in the past).
4 Likes
I did nothing wrong. I asked about something, it was confirmed. A tech mod later also confirmed it publicly in the thread. No rules were broken.
I’m not responsible for changes that happen after I claim they’re gonna happen. I claimed we’d get AIM-54 changes that never happened. I’m just assuming based on stuff that’s been reported and confirming with changes visible to anyone.
If I did something wrong take it to DMs with forum mods or something cuz at this point you’re poorly veiling insults and derailing the thread.
-not off topic-
1 Like
I think it will remain similar, the MiG-29 is already fantastic in BVR. The FOX-3s coming next patch and changes to IR missiles won’t change the meta much imo.
People will keep skimming to avoid radar and preflaring / lowering throttle in head-ons will be necessary for IR missiles (already kinda is).
2 Likes
I’m expecting two new top tier fighters and a bunch of changes to existing ones armament. MiG-29 might not get a fox-3.
1 Like
Just to interject really quick, Considering Oshida does all the datamine’s is it not considered bad practice when he does it? Or is it the specific issue the statement of mods confirming “inside” information to @MiG_23M and then him passing on the info that is the issue.
Just seems like an odd argument about nothing in particular.
I have yet to see @Oshida_BCF come out and declare unreleased content is coming and when it is coming before Gaijin can announce themselves.
How many times has he went to moderators for inside confirmation of specific data that passes through his hands of unreleased content to find out when it is to be released and then race to the forums to advertise it?
That is not the purpose of datamining.
Okay so the unreleased content was the engine changes in this case correct?
So the official announcement would have been today in the form of the changelog they posted?
1 Like
Yes, unreleased content in this case the RD-33 series 3 in which Mig incorrectly interpretted from his limited use in the datamining as a brand-new model
@Oshida_BCF tried to correct his reporting and clearly lay out they do not report cerrtain things. Instead Mig disregarded the community who has done it for year and proclaimed and advertised the new content before it ever was released.
At the end of the day no matter how small the content actually was. The fact remains datamining should be reserved for the few highly competent, morally guided individuals such as @Oshida_BCF
They do their reports for the community to keep transparency of the game. Not predict new content.
Not everyone, not even myself should have such access for personal gain like Mig has demonstrated. I tried to warn him this hobby is very critical and not like bug reporting etc. Because you are handling and exposed to the intellectual properties of GJ, and leaks disrupt their bottom line.
I do not know, but GJ should have a say when and how things are announced or not. In every major company actioned items have been delayed for whatever reason or cancelled.
He gave Gaijin no choice and he is nothing but a mere consumer but is now armed with additional capabilities not offered to the average customer. He is direct violation of his user agreement.
Got it, I either misread or misunderstood @Oshida_BCF’s earlier comments about common practice when it came to creating datamines.
Consider my confusion dispelled.
1 Like
i’d be satisfied with the 9.13 getting r73s, f15 with amraams would be cool too
There isn’t an issue with any of this to my knowledge. Nothing will come of it. Anyone is free to inquire about upcoming changes whether they show up in datamine or not.
In this case, a change was visible in the datamine that clearly reflected a report I inquired about in the past. I see no reason anyone should consider my opinion more or less valid than the other dataminers. If you check my GitHub, it’s the same data any other dataminer is pulling. I just had advance knowledge of a value that was changed.
If that is the case who is the tech mod that gives you a heads up on what content is coming having been actioned? Since you even admitted he confirms a lot of stuff.
Why can’t you reveal his identity?
So we can get inside confirmation as well.
If it is truly appropriate in knowing what is coming to the game long before the general public and GJ can announce themselves.
Why do you sit on the “information” that led you to Mod and why won’t you reveal his identity?
I’ll just say loading up the game after the changes happened and not seeing the name change was confusing for me personally.
Considering how easily people misplace the origin of new information I guess just be careful of what is said. For example I cant even count the times that @Smin1080p himself is blamed for a “Gaijin lie” that wasn’t info that didn’t even remotely come from him.
Well, in this case the technical moderators came in and admitted as much that it was supposed to change to series 3. It also appeared in the changelog.
Maybe worth inquiring to a tech mod to find out if it’s been reported internally or if a report is warranted.
Look, nothing is altered and these are merely your own statements that you keep ignoring. I am only going off what you say.
in which @Oshida_BCF replied. A veteran in the datamining community
and your reply
So, what superior datamining did you use?
It is highly evident that you an arrogant liar and already admitted that it was due to your OWN datamining that you were able to predict what content was coming and referred to you inside contact for confirmation it was actioned for an estimated time the content would be released.
If you really did nothing wrong, simply provide the report and your contact. Did he also say go ahead and announce the unreleased content?
Then you attempt to cover it up by saying it was a report that tipped you off but still have not provided who’s report. Then your story switches up further to “just some information passed to some bug reporters” completely removing yourself from being the only person to advertise new content before any acting official can.
Why did you then refer to yourself as “bug reporters” and the data used as “just some information?”
Hardly the behavior of the innocent.
So who’s datamining led you to believe the engines were in the files and being worked? If not your own?
Again, what gives you a legal right to advertise the content before GJ?
Obviously in this case yes, you were correct and the changelog proves that.
1 Like
And in the past I haven’t been correct. It is what it is, take what I say with a pinch of salt.
The datamining tools simply change the data in the user downloadable files into a readable format. I then upload them to GitHub.
There’s no way for a random user like myself to have access to internal dev builds. I hope the RD-33 series 3 name issue is fixed and it receives the meager additional thrust.
1 Like
i stopped playing the F-16C 2 days after getting it im the OG SMT complainer give me a medal pls
2 Likes