Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29/35 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
5270

i guess it should have the designation 9-41D
image

5271

might be a bit to much AoA compared to the patent
image

1 Like
5272

Ah, I was told they did. I’ll test it later and see

5273

you dont need to test bc nothing changed

the only thing that was changed A2A missile wise was teh RB28
image

1 Like
5274

Alright, thanks, whoever told me probably just got it mixed up

5275

Maybe gaijin had a patent with:

R-77 aoa: yes.

5276

there’s no way they can do 80deg AoA right?? that’s TVC levels

5277

that is how pretty much all Fox-3s behave on the dev
(besides Pheonix and Fakour90)

5278

Yeah but there’s no way this is realistic lol

5279

i dont think so either

i expect (or rather hope) that they arent coming to live in their current state

5280

i except them to tune it down slightly

5281

I caved in and played some games

1 Like
5282

So, gaijin is keeping 8 missiles huh. Well, that presentation had a 3D render of a MiG-35 with R-77s on 2 outremost pylons so i guess it’s enough evidence? Pulling 154 card is not possible because it literally has a different wing, and they already did 9.31 != 9.41 when it was about R-27s

5283

@Ralin how did it go with the internal report on the MiG-35 for 6x R-77-1?

5284

no they did 9.41 =/= 9.41

2 Likes
5285

So i guess 9.41 != 9.41 and MiG-35 = MiG-35. Clever, what can i say. Especially when Rosoboronexport specifically says in their RVV-AE video that only 6 can be used by MiG-35. But i guess RVV-AE and R-77-1 are different missiles (and totally don’t use the same exact ejector launcher)

1 Like
5286

Devs denied it. You can create yourself for public answer.

3 Likes
5287

@Balta779517-live wanna do it? Or i can do it instead

5288

Feel free to do it, i wonder what silly answer they give

1 Like
5289

I’ll gather as much sources as i can and do it in a day