@Savage_Virus_R6 I’d recommend changing your top image to one that was operated by the USSR so that people aren’t confused and think this suggestion is for the Libyan Mig-25
The one off test beds are probably the best candidates. PDSG/PDSL, BVP-50-60 chaff/flare dispensers and spo-15L on the PDSG would be the one I would want to see most.
I chose that specific photograph to ensure the community understands that the MiG-25PD could carry up to four R-60 missiles, not just the heavier, low-maneuverability long-range missiles. It also displays a MiG-25PD carrying both R-60s and Flare/Chaff dispensers. Many in the community might not have been aware of this fact until now, which has often led to major scrutiny and skepticism about the MiG-25’s viability in-game. Clear visual evidence helps clarify this point and counters misconceptions about its loadout options from the get go.
Didn’t know these had countermeasures. I suppose that takes them from a no to a maybe. Somewhere around 11.0 considering the insane speed and all-aspect missiles on an otherwise quite poor aircraft.
It couldn’t be guided in flight, only launched. I believe this feature was intended as a backup option for engaging bombers in the event of heavy radar jamming, allowing the pilot to attempt a hit even without active radar guidance. As mentioned earlier, it wasn’t typical to carry four missiles during high-speed intercepts.
Although, in the manual, the switch literally states “air to ground”, so this is very confusing and I have no explanation for that.
If you watch the second video, you’ll find more details about this feature.
Those would be done by or for export customers and thus not applicable to a VVS or PVO aircraft. Hence why the one off experimental aircraft of PDSG/PDSL are my vote for implementation.
The mirage f1C (not the CT) has an even worse rwr and its at 12.0, and i heard the flight performance of the mig25 is actually pretty bad under like 8k meters (very draggy and sluggish) so i could see it being around 11.0
Don’t see why you can compare this to a Mirage F1C… The only reason the F1 is 12.0 is the Magic 2+ radar missile set. MiG-25 is really weak in the flight performance department due to its weight (built with mostly nickel/steel if I recall correctly)