Ay the devs better implement tha R77 report by the end of dev server
2 Likes
which technically shouldn’t be possible iirc. Controlling unstable airframe with direct input is incredibly difficult
1 Like
yeah it definitely shouldnt. it allows f-16 to win a one circle against stuff like mig-29 or su-27. which is ridiculous. but thats what gaijin gives all planes so its fair for it to have it
1 Like
i would love to look at the pilot capable of piloting F-16 without FBW enabled. Dude must have reaction time of a moongoose
1 Like
added the edit to the structural report
2 Likes
naming FBW a “technical gimmick” is wild…
3 Likes
Most planes are not modeled on safety limits.
G-limiters aren’t a thing in War Thunder at this time.
The engines are over-performing, which is causing the over-performing acceleration.
eurofighter, and grippen are. ik those 2 for sure are modeled off safety limits.
Engines are definitely overperforming but someone already reported that so i dont gotta
From a gameplay standpoint it is a technical gimmick
The annoying part is most aircraft doesn’t model high altitude ranges, but exceptions have been made for other aircraft.
Mig-25 will obviously be one of the exceptions.
22,000 meter ceiling is accurate and nice for Mig-25.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DFT4pGe6HJjN
Any guesses if this will probably go through?
I did try report the g limit and guidance of the R-40 but lacked the name of source the images came from :sob:
Which images?
thats for old r-40 though, not new one
Who wants to bug report this
4 R60M daul Mount’s
4 Likes
That is not evidence in and of itself.
The Mig-21Bis can use the dual pylons on all 4 pylons, that doesn’t mean it has the processing power to use more than 6 R-60s at a time.
That and the wiring difference between R-40s and R-60s can exist.
There this afaik
They can model it, they used to, it’s incredibly unfair however as these limitations are not modelled on any aircraft.