I mean don’t respond. Is it that hard to grasp? Read it, go “hmmm, that’s definitely a thought that was conjured from somebody’s brain!”, then move on with your day.
It is. In every way.
Radar (N011 / N011M), sensor suite (SPO-32 / SPO-32M-1), general avionics from the cockpit to the defense suite. It lacks the maneuverability that the Su-30SM employs and can somewhat argue for the existence of its 30k engines.
Sure, just like most people won’t stipulate between T-80B / T-80U / T-80UM-2 / T-80BVM when talking about T-80s in game, nor the Abrams.
Then again, it’s a direct comparison. If I simply said “M1 Abrams”, you wouldn’t think I was talking about the M1A2 SEPv3 or the M1A1AIMv2. You would think I was talking about the M1 Abrams.
Hence why I said Su-35, not Su-35S.
Even more reason to say Su-35S instead of simplifying it, too.
The… Su-35… We’ve been over this.
The Su-35. If you can’t extrapolate, get back to the books.
Nobody cares about the Su-25T in lieu of the Su-25TM, yet both are in-game.
I feel the later 29Ks would be a far better fit alongside the early Super Hornets. Whether it be 9-41 alongside 18E or 9-47 alongside 18F, I feel they match up quite well together in terms of general ability.
And in every single comment you’d shown your general incredulity and lack of knowledge on the subject. Maybe don’t extrapolate from what wasn’t said and you wouldn’t find yourself getting curbstomped on the intellectual front.
True… i wrote this in 3 am litterly i ment that the Su-57 if you compare it to the Su-47 is trash since the Su-47 has a better flight performance and better stealth potential
So I read into it a bit, Su-27M 701 was slightly different than the others, since it had an angle at the top of the rudder whereas the others were flat.
Other than that, two stand out models were 711 (Later developed into the Su-37) and 710 (Which tested the Al-41s). And given Gaijin’s track record of implementing things which were simply tested (or may not have even existed in some cases), if we got a 27M, it may very well have AL-41s.
Also, Su-35 is indeed a valid name, but most people think of the Su-35S. If someone is confused, why not just refer to it as the Su-27M?
2, there was Su-35 and Su-37.
If talking about specific variations of it, the aircraft line itself was a testbed. There were a dozen, none of which were the exact same.
Everything from T-10M-8 to T-10M-11, as well as T-10M-3, had flattened upper edges of the vertical stabs. They serve to do nothing more than increase fuel load by close to a tonne, which was also helped by its larger wings (quite sure that’s what 703 incorporated first).
More had the smaller stabilizers than not. Not entirely sure why fuel was the primary concern seeing how much of a whale the Su-27 was as a baseline.
It would be interesting to get 710 first, though I feel that would warrant different placement from what I had mentioned.
Who knows, maybe 710 instead of 711 as an event vehicle?
There is no reason for confusion to begin with. I had said Su-35, not Su-35S.
One could also be confused by somebody saying Su-35S, in which case the argument could also be “why not say T-10BM??”… There’s no reason to. It’s what it was called, and what it will be called.
In the USSR TT we have the MiG-29 (9.13) from the Mid 80s with the wrong missiles entirely it should not have R60M or R27ER(It’s designed for the R73, and it couldnt carry the R27ER) , and the MiG-29SMT(9.19) from 2006
We could get the M, S, or K
But i think before we get these versions, the MiG-29 Flight model needs to be fixed
I mean mate we know the Su-35 and Su-35S are different things but usually we just say 27M and 35, anyway nobody talks about the 27M anymore… you know, like how when people talk about the Su-30 they almost always refer to the MKI family and almost never to the MKK family
Su-27M would’ve been much clearer
There isn’t a “we” in this statement… You yourself have even mentioned it plainly as the Su-35.
According to?
Yeah… Nope.
So would T-10M-9, but I’m not going to say “Su-35 / Su-27M / T-10M-9” simply because a couple of autistic forumgoers don’t know the difference between the Su-35 and Su-35S.
