Forgot to toss it up here, but the F-16s along with a myriad of other aircraft are still missing their SADL uplinks on their HMDs. Given the Rafale and EF are getting such, there is no reason as to why other aircraft cannot get the same features if they are capable of it.
1 Like
Disappointed to see the BMD-4M as a premium vehicle, especially how prevalent they are along with the BMP-3 IRL. The BMD-4M should be Researchable and should be placed at BR 9.7 with 30mm 3UBR11 APFSDS-T rounds.
4 Likes
Not a single new MBT in the span of an entire year… and barely any fixes for the currently broken ones at all (no, I’m not counting wrong coaxial machine gun ammo counts/names/smoke grenade calibers).
Bugs that have been reported and “acknowledged” for months, and even years… for nothing. And then they say: “we encourage you to make bug reports”… what for? They are only shelved and forgotten by them.
3 Likes
At this point MBT’s became tool for to spawn in CAS and with EFT and Rafale addition it will be even more obvious.
Personally im gonna spam my Leclerc’s in order to spawn in Rafale so i can spam some IR Guided AASM on Pantsir’s way :D
1 Like
It’s wild to me that you can look at every rank 8 ground tree right now and it is empty, maybe 3 vehicles (most of which had already been in the game and were moved up) for each nation.
1 Like
Well I don’t think we’ll see a lot of totally new MBTs regardless, but I would have prefered at least some heavily upgraded/modified MBTs.
The 2A7HU was the only decent/worthwhile addition to top tier ground this year.
A whole year, soon to be 5 updates and 1 worthwhile addition for top tier ground so far is a bit of a joke.
3 Likes
At this point it really feels like the whole “Rank VIII” deal they overhyped was just a move to sell Top Tier Premiums.
They have only added 2 game-changing MBTs (Leopard 2A7V, Leopard 2A7HU, these being merely counterparts to the long already ingame Strv 122s), which is what Rank VIII was suppossed to be about… and all other “Rank VIIIs” are just Rank VIIs which were implemented years ago and had their rank changed to VIII.
And here I was, expecting more Strv 122A/B/PLSS/Leopard 2A7V/HU counterparts…
7 Likes
Thankfully, there is another “variant” of the BMD-4M that could be added to the tech tree. No-so-thankfully, however, it is off-limits due to current events. For real though, this is one of the few times I’m hoping for a camo-net premium so we can have the standard BMD-4M in the tree.
1 Like
Bam, in your face 😂, I think he have a headache after this…
“non service-related injury”
9 Likes
Has the 35mm version been considered instead of the 30mm version of the CV90 Mk.4?
Right now the CV90 Mk.4 is more of a side grade to the other Strf90 due to the fire rate of the 30mm cannon.
3 Likes
probly for premium yeh XD
Is T1E1 the only tank getting the Volumetric or its variant, the T1E1 (90), too?
I want to spread some awareness of other incorrect (aircraft) ammunition:
7.7mm Vickers E
British 7.7mm API and IT did not exist
B-20 cannon uses outdated ammunition
MG FF uses incorrect ammunition
High velocity 7.92mm rounds should only be used by MG 17
RoF of Browning Aircraft MGs too low
This report was acknowledged a year ago but hasn’t been fixed yet:
French 7.5mm using IT bullets
7 Likes
British tanks im their 7,92mm Besas are also still using German general and Aircraft ammo, beeing the P.m.K and S.m.K. L’Spur.
This lack every weapon for the the f4.1 and lack some of the f3 and even f2
Also T-160 cannons
FMC T-160 20mm Cannon AP-I/API-T rounds error
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WAK96Zu6Rot6
LOL, how are you going to hit him by accident? If you are afraid of shooting the friendly, don’t shoot.
I accidentaly teamkill maybe 2 guys per month and that’s me.spraying 20mm from 1000m away at a guy actively dogfighting.
1 Like