I would direct any inquires to the entire 8000+ post forum post in the Machinery of War section that proved over the course of like 2 months that the KH-38MT was never produced and only existed as a mockup.
3 Likes
Many things in War Thunder were never produced :)
In fact, let’s make it more realistic. If there were only a few of something produced, you can’t play it because chances are you would not have IRL.
Germany is gonna suffer so hard in the ground
1 Like
so only America and Isreal are getting the 120C5 great not like the F-15Es are super strong already
5 Likes
And still no AGM65 flight profile fixes :(
1 Like
Is there a way to not have the interface changes? A toggle in the settings somewhere? Its just useless clutter
next next major update
no.
operations on a carrier (short: carrier ops), is everything that happens on a carrier (maybe including landing patterns, and Carrier ATC, which noone does).
The other part is what a carrier strike group (way more than 4 ships btw, esp with 2 carrier) does tactically and how it shapes the battlefield.
2 Likes
Take a closer look on F-15E. Especially its model and camos. It’s entirely fictionalized now, not even close to mock-ups.
1 Like
bug W
1 Like
Yes, many Russian things.
The Comanche may be denied it’s full stinger loadout now due to it “not being produced” meanwhile the KH-38MT exists.
Lets also remove the YAK-141 from the game as it was never functional as well, along with Sevastapol as both exist in forms that were never produced nor were capable of being produced.
11 Likes
You are incorrect. Find sources, because most define carrier operations as the operation of fixed-wing and rotary aircraft on and around an aircraft carrier for performance of combat or noncombat missions.
On and around for combat or noncombat.
2 Likes
Naval BR ceiling going from 7.0 to 8.7 in a single patch!? That’s outstanding, and very much unprecedented, thank you! :D
2 Likes
2 Launcher and 1 Radar is what it is supposed to be
3 Likes
noticed this by accident test flying the premium F-2A
Genuinely caught me offguard by how much of an upgrade it is
In game it still shows 800 on the Luchs A2. Error or wanted?
I tested it a bit and compared it to manuals, loft profile isn’t too off in WT. At maximum, the Maverick only gains ~650m altitude for long range and sealevel, which it does in-game too roughly. IRL it lofts at 5G up until 20° AOA, bascially it’s not that good irl either.
Drag is too high still then, and booster (sustain phase thrust) is underperforming, all reported, but we’ll see. If the leaked AGM-65 changes were only the FoV and trackrate change, then that’s kinda eh.
1 Like
Not just Russian though. I predict many would be upset if we cut trees down, especially needlessly.
It’s been long overstated that most of the “fake” vehicles are Soviet, when this is factually not true. The nation with the most fake vehicles award goes to Germany.
Not to mention there are tech trees which desperately could use some paper vehicles to fill themselves out, Japan comes to mind.
I see no harm in paper vehicles being added to actually let people fight in more than 2 tanks for each tier.
9 Likes
No not at all, its a mishmash of multiple, real, F-15E blocks and is something gaijin has done with multiple different aircraft in the US tech tree starting with the F-4E.
None were only mockups, all were real blocks of the aircraft in question, gaijin however willingly picks and chooses components from different blocks for their own gain.
The US F-15E as of now should have a sniper pod and it’s expanded CMS systems, it does not, this does not however make it fictional nor a mockup like the YAK-141 which never existed, nor could in the form we have in game.
Yes just Russian, almost all other fictionalized / paper offerings are already being removed from other nation’s trees, the R2Y2 series is the most recent loss due to this.
Thats rich given Japan is loosing such vehicles right now.
3 Likes