Currently.
- Nothing more to buy for the Soviets.
- It was a sale.
So the bad F-18, I mean the F-18C for Finland doesn’t get the C-5, is still 14.0 and the MLU2 isn’t even folderd?! Now it’s just worse in every way at the same BR.
1 Like
No it doesn’t make a difference to point lock, it still defaults to point lock
Shouldnt this also apply to the Leopard 2K, since it also uses the Rh202? Or was the Leopard 2K’s RoF already correct to begin with?
What about the Aim-120C-5 for the Eurofighter Typhoon’s?
3 Likes
Haha, not a chance.
Go to Series production aircraft<Tranche 2<Block 10<Air/Air
It should get them as its US equivalent, the F-15E is getting them. It definetly carried them, in fact the Typhoon FGR4 probably exclusively used Aim-120C5s until Meteor entered service.
The issue is, the Typhoon is percieved to be this OP, can do anything aircraft and thus is rather heavily nerfed at the moment and the community seems to be completely against it getting any buffs or fixes.
Loadouts are always a balancing decision so we’ll have to wait and see if the Typhoon gets the better wepaon or not, but as it currently stands Im doubting it will, which will mean that ontop of all the other nerfs and issues the Typhoon has to deal with, it will also have to deal with being outclassed in A2A by literally everyone else at 14.0 by having the weakest ARH AAM
3 Likes
Anyone noticed israel F15C’s radar been replaced by the origin anapg63 psp?
I find it a decent plane all around (except maybe at CAS potential) but if it’s up to me, it should get C5s regardless.
IMHO community’s takes are becoming increasingly meaningless and hyperbolic each update, now everything is either DOA or meta-changing, when there’s arguably a significant amount of variables to consider along the way. In theory Gaijin won’t fix EFs CAS potential this time so C5s could be the improved selling point.
To be completely fair, most of the community’s takes also fall under at least one the next three principles:
-
People that haven’t played the vehicles/platforms they’re complaining in the first place.
-
Folks that do have played them, had a bad performance though relates to other experienced players to back their claims (just the classic argument from authority)
-
Overly biased users to whatever nation they’ve invested most of their playtime.
3 Likes
yes a total nerf, no DL, no Radar HMD, no NCTR, no TWS, no DL channels, i hope that after this change the Python-4 becomes really considered for this jet.
WTF?
2 Likes
What, the HMD?
This place was a warzone yesterday. Holy crap.
For anyone that doesnt know what that means - they can shoot without ANY LINE OF SIGHT AT ALL, they can shoot behind a hill literally making it LOAL.
If it works anything like the Rafale’s hammers (which are also IR+IOG+GNSS) this is entirely false. It will not lock on without line of sight. I haven’t tested the Kh-38MTs on the devserver yet, but I doubt they are different.
I think literally the only difference this makes is they will drift less if the target pops smoke.
1 Like
Was really excited to try out the new fuel dump and burn on the F-111.
And then realising it currently doesn’t render in the replay.
Hopefully it gets fixed by the time the update releases.
Got a bug report now for it.
[DEV] Fuel dump not rendering in replay on the current devserver
1 Like
I mean, it already is better than the US F-5E at the same BR
War Thunder? More like 2A4 Thunder
2 Likes
Its .3 higher than the US F-5E. Yeah its got a better radar and an ever so slightly better missile (it can radar slave) but i want to see it with a better missile like the P4 for the higher BR.
Maybe they can even add a “late” version with the AIM-9P-5