Just asking, what’s the point of dev server and bug reports if they don’t acknowledge any. CS/SA5‘s painting can’t influence missile launcher // Gaijin.net // Issues
Not a bug apparently.
1 Like
We all have an ideal high tier Swedish tree that Gaijin butchered, so here is mine
J35D , foldered with J35J
AJ37, foldered with AJS37, comes right after the A-35 Draken (Or F-35 as Danish call, the incoming squad vehicle)
Then we pull a CV90105 move and replace J35XD with J35Ö to put Finnish Draken into the subtree
For squad vehicle, I suggest J35F with AIM-26s, not so special but F-4C equivalent. Not every squad vehicle has to be secret premiums that shine.
I don’t think we need another event vehicle at rank VII honestly. Basic JA 37 would be fine
Edit: I read somebody suggested the F-35 to be placed below Saab 105s. You might want to check this recently passed suggestion:
[DEV] CS/SA5 Incorrect 30mm ammunition count // Gaijin.net // Issues
““It’s a source on a different vehicle, so this is not a solid proof.””
1 Like
MiG-29 Sniper got the N019E radar on dev now
Especially funny to limit the launch speed on the Su-25’s to Mach 1.4 as they break at like Mach 0.95 lol.
“submitted as a suggestion” still somenthing.
From what I can find online, the SK 60F never existed.
Saab had an old plane (60134) they used as a mockup for proposed stuff like the 60F and the 2060, but apparently the plane itself wasn’t actually modified.
So unfortunately it’s mostly a paper plane.
The main question of update is constant Naval server crashes will be fixed. The problem is year+ long.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zsFl4JaROpgu
Just get another one crash
https://warthunder.com/ru/tournament/replay/349627071087345145?public_key=UOWlwLc8M1wOUKRPSEy9
And don’t tell me that is network problem(like your “bugreport managers” state closing all report on this problem) cause it crashed for all players.
2 Likes
If i have understood things correctly: That is how i works for all missile carries in game, none of them change colors on the tubes when changing color on the vehicle. It’s not a bug because that is how it is intended to work for every vehicle.
Oh, nvm then. If it is as real as F-16AJ it can come but Sweden has cas options around there, or options that can be filled by Hawk or Gnat
Dev Server will stay opened until Wednesday, 11th June.
11 Likes
Please update Pinned Dev-server Info Thread
AIM-120C-5 (M1097A2 (SLAMRAAM)):
- speed limit: 1000 → 780 m/s
how it can be? Air ver has 1500 m/s
Wtf? Artifition nato spaa nerf??
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT
Can the developers comment on why the game completely ignored the existence of HE for british 381 mm?
With the introduction of Britain’s last battleship (on which I note they were used
Spoiler
) we got a situation where not a single 381mm operator unit from the earliest to the latest was unworthy of this type of projectile.
It’s because the ground launched version is being stationary-launched. The air launched version can be launched from an aircraft going at supersonic speeds. Higher launch speed gives you a higher top speed, as well as more range.
This is also why the AIM-120C-5 has a 120km range when air launched, but only a 25km range when ground launched.
5 Likes
Ans somehow the iris-t slm rated for 40km range getsbthe same speed as the ground launched amraam thats stated for 25km.
If you think amraams got it bad, tjink again
I would still pick the SLM over the slamraam every day of the week in their current iterations.
Still waiting on the AN/MPQ-64 fixes to be applied, they did add target identification, but only the bog standard “Is it a single or twin engine jet” mode that, for some reason, only NATO gets. This is a modern radar used for CIWS work in some cases, it has to be able to identify even mortar rounds by size and type, there is no reason why it should be unable to properly identify known aircraft by their type.
Then again the AN/APG-86(V)7 is still fully missing the feature so I guess I should be happy this thing was given the ability to at least know what a plane is.
Oh yeah, and the premium US F/A-18C is still a direct downgrade to the Swiss premium one at the same exact BR. Its very disappointing that people don’t see this as a massive issue as gaijin is currently flat out selling a copy paste premium that is just better than another premium shortly after the previous one ran it’s initial sales course. This should not be happening.