and like i said, i clearly mentioned the missile being immune to it. as compared to SARH. everyone knows that as well
iirc IRST is not very prone to being decoyed by flares unless theyre spammed a whole lot
uhh yeah… thats cuz it isnt
ACLOS radar guidance, SACLOS/ACLOS IR track with the internal IRST
its the system the french roland 1 has since it doesnt have a track radar it only has an IRST
hey uhm is it just me or is Dev broken rn?
Fine for me
There definitely are options to have the carrier spawns be balanced, but they would rather just get rid of the ability to spawn on carriers, turning carriers into glorified bombing targets.
Like 99% of the playerbase is never going to land on these new carriers to repair/re-arm. People can’t be bothered to land properly on the regular airfields (if they even RTB at all), they won’t be willing to take their time to try and land on a carrier.
I will definitely crash on a daily basis trying to land on these carriers.
Same, except for when I’m flying a Harrier lol
Ok yeah the recon variant apparently has the same ordnance options and weapons as the standard one, which is a bit unusual.
At least according to a danish old magazine (FORSVARETS FLY EFTER 1945) I can kinda comprehend as a swede.
But honestly I’m not upset about it being a squadron plane because I dislike squadron planes but simply because I want the Austrian Draken as a squadron plane. Otherwise they might make it an event reward or premium.
that makes it more interesting
Also, people can barely land on an AF without crashing. Going to be funny to watch them try to land on a carrier, especially in aircraft without a tail hook
I don’t think you’ll be seeing many people trying lol
Thinking about it, there will probably be more people trying to land non-naval planes on the carriers, coz you know, “if it has a hook, it has to be able to land on a carrier, right?”
I was about to question you about it being old, since I bought a brand new copy of it at a museum last year, but then I looked inside the magazine, with it having a copy right from 1995…
Which planes have a hook but can’t land on a carrier?
Tornado, F15, I think maybe F16s. Typhoon. Etc etc.
Arrestor hooks are also used on runways in an emergency
All of them can land on carriers, but F-16s, F-15s, Jaguars, T-2s/F-1s, F-104s, Alpha Jets, etc aren’t built for carrier operations lol
Imagine how large a carrier would have to be to let Tornados successfully take off lol
Just need some RATOs
I haven’t tried in most of those but f16’s are quite easy to land on a carrier, I have it imagine some of those others are too. @Morvran too
Maybe, its getting down slow enough and balancing between stalling and flying. Also if the Carriers are moving in a circle then its nearly impossible.
Only aircraft other than the VTOLs that I can reliably land (In SB) is the Bucs and Sea Vixen
I can imagine F-16s being easy to land on carriers, but realistically you wouldn’t be able to take off again in most non-naval planes
I’ve done carrier landings in the Jaguars and T-2 as well, but you know there are bound to be people out there trying to land Starfighters, Eagles and Tornados on the carriers.
Gonna be especially funny if Gaijin remembers to disable re-arming and repairing on carriers for non-naval planes.
The default is usually you just airspawn above the carrier if you arent in a carrier capable aircraft.