Anyone noticed israel F15C’s radar been replaced by the origin anapg63 psp?
I find it a decent plane all around (except maybe at CAS potential) but if it’s up to me, it should get C5s regardless.
IMHO community’s takes are becoming increasingly meaningless and hyperbolic each update, now everything is either DOA or meta-changing, when there’s arguably a significant amount of variables to consider along the way. In theory Gaijin won’t fix EFs CAS potential this time so C5s could be the improved selling point.
To be completely fair, most of the community’s takes also fall under at least one the next three principles:
-
People that haven’t played the vehicles/platforms they’re complaining in the first place.
-
Folks that do have played them, had a bad performance though relates to other experienced players to back their claims (just the classic argument from authority)
-
Overly biased users to whatever nation they’ve invested most of their playtime.
3 Likes
yes a total nerf, no DL, no Radar HMD, no NCTR, no TWS, no DL channels, i hope that after this change the Python-4 becomes really considered for this jet.
WTF?
2 Likes
What, the HMD?
This place was a warzone yesterday. Holy crap.
For anyone that doesnt know what that means - they can shoot without ANY LINE OF SIGHT AT ALL, they can shoot behind a hill literally making it LOAL.
If it works anything like the Rafale’s hammers (which are also IR+IOG+GNSS) this is entirely false. It will not lock on without line of sight. I haven’t tested the Kh-38MTs on the devserver yet, but I doubt they are different.
I think literally the only difference this makes is they will drift less if the target pops smoke.
1 Like
Was really excited to try out the new fuel dump and burn on the F-111.
And then realising it currently doesn’t render in the replay.
Hopefully it gets fixed by the time the update releases.
Got a bug report now for it.
[DEV] Fuel dump not rendering in replay on the current devserver
1 Like
I mean, it already is better than the US F-5E at the same BR
War Thunder? More like 2A4 Thunder
2 Likes
Its .3 higher than the US F-5E. Yeah its got a better radar and an ever so slightly better missile (it can radar slave) but i want to see it with a better missile like the P4 for the higher BR.
Maybe they can even add a “late” version with the AIM-9P-5
when will the f2 adtw preorder go live 🥀
1 Like
Sweden suffers, 2 hornets to research is bs. Bad one still 14.0 with no C-5, literally worse in every way.
New reports are up.
7 Likes
Likely this week, probably either tomorrow or Tuesday, given that the F-2A was the first aircraft shown in the trailer and there was emphasis on Japan through the trailer
I really hope the ADTW gets that beautiful blue camo of the original F-2A, I also wonder what the pre-order bonuses will be
Swedish players are simply too good, Gaijin fears they would become all powerful beings if they treated Sweden as equal to other nations, and not lesser, much like France. (I’m totally not biased)
2 Likes
2 Likes
Yea thanks for pointing it out i got some explanation for another guy and he said that ML works how i stated but MT doesnt but thats a bug for the time being and hope it stays that way. This thing will be broken af
This also means Japan will be ignored for the next 5 years
4 Likes
Any info if the Bismarck will recieve any historical camos?
It’s ever so slightly better. It has a better radar (mostly useless for the F-5E) and missiles that can slave to the radar.
Most would rather see it go up to 11.7 or so and get its historical AIM-9P-5 missiles though (all aspect Ps with IRCCM and smokeless motors)
In reality it also had the late model aerodynamic improvements (larger LERX and the shark nose) but the performance benefits of these are not reflected in-game