Bruh… They think we will forget these things. Fk that, i have it written on a paper and put on my ceiling when i wake up so i wont forget snail sins
I will keep drilling the topic and prove (cuz some believe otherwise) that snail doesnt listen to community at all
REMEMBER: “we are not greedy bastards here”
If modelled according to IRL improvements, yes.
That is sometnihg no one knows
Waiiit…
F-18C still shares the same 14.0BR with F/A-18C (Late) and F/A-18C MLU2 without AIM-120C and HMD?
Did I miss Gaijin’s official explanation of why?
My bet is that it will be, and it’s a middle finger to any improvement to the 120C5, making it a frankenstein 120A+ with only a better motor.
If they just add motor time while carrying the same ahistorical AOA to C7s, it would only expose further the already proven incompetence and hypocrisy of the 120s introduction in-game.
Yeah I know, the Soyuz seems to be bias incarnate so far. Every other ship (y’know, those that were actually built) have some sort downside based on their real life usage (like Richelieu not having its correct muzzle velocity because “the charges blew up at Dakar”… in an extremely hot environment which played a big role in what happened) but the battleship that had to have its main belt armor split in two plates because they couldn’t produce anything bigger than 230mm and had one of its sister ship scrapped in place after only 6 months of building (Sovetskaya Belorussiya) because it had literally tens of thousands of faulty rivets gets everything “as designed”…
But even if we ignore all questionable stuff above, I’d really like to have an answer from gaijin as to WHY it’s not affected even by soft stats which are used for balance purpose.
It’s already better than Iowa and Yamato, it should absolutely get hit by the nerf bat on its RoF since its BR can’t be increased further.
Its Gaijin. it will probably somehow be worse.
Yup, they could have given it any RoF they wanted. 35 seconds would not be a bad RoF for it.
Then you also have the new premiums with double their IRl RoF
bunch of other things
ask DevilO6 he did most of them
How many times do I have to tell you, no.
Not pantsir type.
But Indeed search radar TWS, so more of the new AA style.
i have short memories like a gold fish dude mb
Yeah and the lack of BOL, PIDS, and sniper pod on American fighters??
Smin said that the F-2 will be the only plane that gets access to the Sniper pod at this time at least twice today
OK so… any progress about this bug report? @Smin1080p_WT
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N0hW8xkf8rms
It has been quite some time since aircraft equipped with GE F110 engines were implemented, but except for the F-2, the turkey feather has not been fixed. I know 3D models are bit different but, it is just a reskin issue, so it shouldn’t take that long to fix.
Hello, Gaijin team.
Please also make sure that HKP3C from Sweden is also getting the upgraded damage model.
Thank you.
is there any news or any indication that israeli planes this update would receive the spice 2000,1000 and 250 ? would really like to know
Yeah but smin isn’t always completely informed or he doesn’t tell us stuff for a purpose.
Which report link please?
Im a tad confused why you would then ask:
If you don’t wish to believe the answers because, what answer were you looking for?
We can only provide the answers we have. So im not sure why asking a question already answered today would yield a different result.
As we have already said Sniper is currently planed for the F-2. There are suggestion reports already both internal and external for other aircraft that could use it (A-10, F-16, F-15). Its possible they may in the future.
Similarly BOL is not planned for US aircraft for now this major.
