It really sucks that Gaijin can’t get its act together to deliver a plane that should’ve come immediately after the abomination that’s the F-16AJ.
We are very unlikely to get the F-2 late, so now we have to wait again for an F-2 with only four JDAMS, probably NO ASM-2s at all, AIM-7s instead of AAM-4….
i m sad to see nothing about the PzH 2000 reports Spall Liner Modern Ammo that could be copy pasted from the Type 99 still nothing about the Ready Rack on the CR2s
Seriously? What a stealthly nerf of all things
Any hope of getting, the following report looked since it seems to have been missed when revising the M1 modules?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
or does it need to be re-reported?
Im gonna come in here and ask where the model change for the Kfir C.10 is.
It has the wrong cockpit window externally, bug report was accepted and im just curious if its been implemented this patch! spend so many hours grinding this aircraft out just for the wrong window
Adding the historically correct Netz as an 80 euro pack is insane
It has to be added as a TT plane too
As yes, a basket, some metal sheets preventing the crew’s feet/legs from getting caught is clearly integral to the traverse mechanism of the turret.
As usual, 1 step forwards, 2 steps back.
Gaijin’s motto.
I’m sorry but removing the CCIP from the domestically upgraded Super Mystere using a source from the pre-upgrade version makes very little sense
Good update to uninstall the game…
Until something interesting happens like decompression or something that will make things we already have and they are not viable, viable.
from a ground main this update is very dissapointing
Isnt it a premium vehicle?
More variety is good, and I’m glad to see Denmark in air RB.
Hell yeah. Hopefully it can do more damage now.
Lmao.
The most fire resistant bomber is getting more fire resistant?
If you want to sell the Ariete pack fix it first
Are you seriously doomposting right now? It is almost likely that we are going to see the F-2A Late in some update in full capability since we literally had fighter jets from the 2010s right now.
I think Gaijin is still figuring out a crucial part of the F-2A kit which is the AN/AAQ-33 Sniper targeting pod.
Hey, this is actually GREAT news, thank you!!! I am looking forward to play Naval now.
Since ships are getting more refined and realistic ways to be destroyed and sunk, can we get rid of the artificial survivability nerf involving lethal shell room detonations? I don’t think it is necessary anymore.
The more detailed and refined modules are welcome, but I am not sure about making the turret baskets a part of the horizontal drive; specially since only 2 families of MBTs would be getting this treatment.
I believe the turret baskets on the Abrams and Leopards should only act as a sort of spall protection (as of now, they don’t even stop any spalling at all).
Otherwise, these two families of MBTs will be receiving a big additional weakness compared to the other tanks that still do not have any of this.
Regarding refined models related to the Abrams- will the Abrams finally receive their volumetric turret rings anytime soon, as well as revised fuel tank bulkheads and revised hydraulic pump placement?
Turret basket =/= turret drive
Developers, you should not treat them the same
The basket is purely for crew comfort and safety, nothing about it is functional so damage to it would not interfere in turret operation in any way
I’m working on a bug report, Could someone post a Screenshot of the new stat card for both of the 2.75" rocket M151 (GPHE) [e.g APKWS II; AH-1Z / F-16C etc.] & M247 (HEAT) [standard Hydra / FFAR warhead; LAV-AD / many aircraft] warheads please, I need them for a report.
and I’m trying to pre calculate what the overpressure penetration values should be if they align with the following source.
Report is live
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CiCzmAQkwJo4
Great, another nerf for the leopard and still no d-tech armor for leo 2 pso and 2a7v’s
