Chaffee is a fine example of yet another British service vehicle hidden behind the Lend-Lease barrier. 289 vehicles were shipped to the UK under Lend-Lease, and saw action during WW2.
Stuart, Lee, Grant, Sherman, Chaffee, Locust. None of these names were given by the US Army to these vehicles!
out of an initial order of 600, if the war had continued it would have hit that, from my understanding the surplus is where alot of the chaffees represented with the other nations in game came from, where as with the sherman V’s/M4A4 i know for a fact they are ex British stock XD
I hope france gets it too, which was the 2nd largest user of M24 chaffee after the US.
Those little tanks can improve any lineup, and most of them actually needed them.
+1
The country that operated over 25% of all Chaffees built are yet to receive the second half of the M24 they are missing as well. Chaffee for everybody!
I think GB should absolutely receive the Chaffee, as they operated it, but I think the F/A-18 is completely overboard, and GB absolutely doesn’t need it and shouldn’t have it.
To be clear; I don’t think any nation other than the US and maybe Sweden should receive the F/A-18- and even then, Sweden should have only had one variant, not two.
The fact of the matter is Gaijin hands out US aircraft like Candy not because of historical accuracy or some other reason, but because it is cheap and easy for Gaijin to do to make them money. They simply use the excuse of “affiliated nations” to make it so they don’t have to do any work.
This, where as when it comes to ground alot of these land lease tanks were actual British armoured unit backbone, and we still lack one the sherman v is the most painful followed by the chaffee
I would much prefer something actually British, like one of the many armored cars they used/developed. Two of the best candidates for such are thing are sadly event vehicles right now. I’m against the Danish M24 as well.