M1A2 SEP V2 doesnt have better LFP armour

I’ll ignore you shifting the goalpost again since you didn’t actually post a license of GDLS manufacturing turrets (you thought you did, lol.)

But I’ll point out that the new form is labeled “Amendment No. 09” at the top. Meaning there is a change.:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0624/ML062410022.pdf

"3. License number SUB-1536 is renewed in
its entirety to read as follows: "

“Is renewed to read as follows” means that what this new license states is now valid, replacing the previous version. They omitted the limit of 5 DU hulls, and have now said that both turrets and hulls are “as needed.”

They omitted the specified limit, and explicitly state that the hulls can now be issued “as needed” as the turrets were all along.

They wouldn’t have needed to omit the limit of 5 hulls unless they were using DU in more hulls. They would have omitted the hulls entirely if they decided that no hulls would have DU.

Cope.

2 Likes

Ammendment 9 for Form 374 is dated 22 February 2006
Form 374 has always had as needed (at least from 2006 at the same time as Form 313)
The Form 313 document, is dated 22 February 2006
They are both referring to the same renewal application of the NRC license owned by TACOM that they submitted in 22 February 2006 (SUB-1536)
Previous renewals and the original license are not available on the NRC Website.

“They omitted the specified limit, and explicitly state that the hulls can now be issued “as needed” as the turrets were all along.”
They never omitted it, it never changed from 2006 to 2019

You are just being obtuse at this point

Then where does it say “5 DU hulls” in the amended version? Also, the Amendment 9 form is dated AUG 24 2006. LOL!

Yes, they omitted the limit on 5 hulls. They said the hulls would be issued as needed, along with the turrets. There is no limit set on either. You are wrong in every measure yet again. XD

The updated form removed the limit of 5 DU hulls. Cope.

3 Likes

In the worst case scenario if they don’t correct the hull armor (even though a lot of the values for modern tank armor are made up anyway), I hope the eventual spall liner addition/corrections will actually work as they should, same for Leclerc, Ariete, etc.

2 Likes

They got values, lets see how it turns out
M1A2 SEP ( v1, v2 ) missing hull armor // Gaijin.net // Issues

6 Likes

Good stuff.

quick question, are you sure GDLS makes the armour.

ah yes bugged pso great addition lol

ah yes the usual skill issue coming from a ru main

Shh back to handheld ru forum

8 Likes

grafik

6 Likes

Off topic for hull armour, but does anyone have any info on the FLIR the SEPv2 used i.e. Block 1 B-kit? There is a source from Raytheon claiming it was an improved FLIR over what the SEP used.

it was Block 1

Yea but does anyone have anything on the Block 1 B-kits? According to Raytheon it had better resolution then the Block 0 FLIR that the SEP used:

Block 1 second generation FLIRs will improve Block 0 performance and put more capability in the hands of war fighters. The new system generates a clearer image with more scene contrast, less jitter and higher resolution.

Actually have a theory of how to connect TCA (Tandem Ceramic Armor) with DU information. There is a chance, that TCA implemented in M1s is using for its ceramic element one of the uranium oxides

1 Like

yess!! please gaijin make this game balance, give M1A2 DU armor and balance this game, the new update just like copy paste from M1A2 SEP, and you give the job to the internship to do an improvement :(

So. Sources below align with each other. Its funny. We shall wait and see the gajin reaction
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jh4806nWWEYT?comment=pklKGqrbT8IIlqaz09geqWny

1 Like

Thats because NGAP/NEA, armor now used on SEPv3 and future generations is DU-free.

It also talks only about M1A1. Not M1A2

where does the Abrams weight growth data come from?

From New FCS, added armour inserts, improved transmission and improved ATG 1500.

@WaretaGarasu @Kenny110 @_Renzo

Did we ever have a response concerning the value found in the declassified CIA report?

That one? It could be what we need regarding the armor value they’ve been asking for.

5aa0612b892fb_M1Armour2.jpg.d4c329dee388f695ae4aecca19332379 (1)

5 Likes