Damn…
1 Like
No!
Its prior to SEPv3 so thats enough
This is why I always get angry.
+Hey, this is wrong, can you fix it?
-Just do a bug report.
+It was made; over a year ago, and accepted. But there it still remains, unfixed.
-Devs can’t fix everything instantly.
+One thing is “everything instantly”, and another thing is to leave things unfixed for years; it’s very important, and it’s just-
-We just fixed the ammo count of a tank’s co-axial machine gun. See? We fix bugs, the one you are interested in will eventually come.
+But it’s objectively more important tha-
-Nuh uh, just because you are personally interested in the main Top Tier tanks of the game to be accurately represented for both historical and balance reasons it doesn’t mean it’s actually more important than the wrong caliber of this tank’s smoke grenades. Move along.
15 Likes
It’s unfunny because it’s true…
3 Likes
Some concerns/questions regarding Materials License reports:
First one states: A. 275,000 kg, but only for the turret frontal armor packages, and B. 25 kg for turret side armor.
Second one states turret side armor, but A. is limited to 4535 kg whereas B. is limited to 25 kg.
Surely those weight figures for side armor are drastically too low to be of any practical use in armor plates?
Do you have the full contract? I´m going through DoD´s database and they only have contracts starting 2014
Nah, you got it wrong.
Turret and hull front armor has its own license ie:SUB-1536
This one is for turret side armor only.
A. For use (excluding repair and maintenance) and storage during removal of side armor turret and
installation of new side armor in M1 series tanks.
B. Contamination resulting from removal of side armor turret in M1 series tanks.
Unfortunately no 😕
Though I don´t interpret from the material licence that the new side turret is supposed to have DU elements (I don´t see the practical benefits of that). Rather, and given the timeline, all turret armor is to be dismounted, frontal HAP-3 replaced with NEA and side turret module with an improved array.
Only benefit would be added protection in urban environments much like the ones they were in during the time. Adding more armor to the sides of the turret will help protect Crews from ambushes.
isnt that what tusk for
Yes. But if you notice there is more ERA on the hull then the turret. You will need extra Armor to protect the turret sides from what ERA fails to stop.
what theyre saying is DU = increased armor. most arent saying how much exactly it should be rhae but what is being said is unclassified - du being used in armor should increase the armor effectiveness compared to not being used and being replaced by worse SD materials
From what I gather from sources, DU elements don´t do much if anything against HEAT so placing them on the turret sides doesn´t make much sense to me.
if you look at all the game bug fixes and realism adjustments with a heart and then take a look at who made those bug reports you notice that it was forum members and many bug reports also happened because people shared information to make it possible, on the forums
think for yourself
The game at top tier is less like real combat than 6BR .All it needs is for the computer monkey at Gaijin to make the M1 take a few more hits and bingo we have a game.
so you weren’t able to argue against anything that i said when i replied to you, instead you had some random rant.
ok proves my point bye have fun lol
Sorry I didn’t realise you wanted a shitty argument
Not to sure. I know IEDs and tandem warheads were a primary concern for forces during that timw period. I think there were a few tanks left over too.