My bad last time I looked at the sources it was the 35%-50% better protection stat.
2 Likes
A3 was designed to cut through relic like butter my guy.
4 Likes
m829A1 was stopped by relikt but not A3 which was designed to go like through butter… please check your facts :)
2 Likes
Yeah there was the source of the improved BRL package giving 33-35% improvement vs KE, there was this website someone linked in the comments that estimated 580-630mm vs KE (I’m just not sure how reputable that one is) and there was a document of the russion office of public affairs (or something similar) that estimated 700-750mm vs KE for the M1A2 SEP LFP.
I understand it’s a bit confusing yeah, it was one crazy weekend. A lot of documentation was found over the weekend so if you missed a day you could have already missed quite a lot of documents lol.
1 Like
And by 2011 M829A4 surpassed A3 and was the main Abrams round.
1 Like
Going by your standards that sounds like a cope.
2 Likes
oh so where is the proof that the systems actually do that?
I can see NONE
If they wrote that it can stop a laser bearm from space would you belive that too?
1 Like
Oh you can see the proof by looking at the round photos… longer slimmer = more effectivness… read about it how it works… you know books which show you calculations and physics ?
1 Like
Yet all you have done is link a random russian website, hardly credible evidence that it can stop A3 or A4.
2 Likes
Lol before i give you proof. You first need to prove that abrams can tank a 3bm42 🤭 because i have my doubts
We already have the russian estimates in the bug report. Why would the russians estimate the hull at 700-750mm vs KE if their own 3BM42 was enough to pen it.
And you likely just say this because you don’t have any reputable source.
Last but not least, all this proofs that you are just here to derail the topic and start flamewars.
1 Like
If russian source that quotes relikt protecting from m829a3 is wrong than why is this one better?
I don’t believe you 😞
Because the russians use LOS, NOT flat pen equivalent, which is why now 11 t series tanks including the t90 have 100mm more armor than they should.
8 Likes
A nation like Russia will always try to make their own stuff seem very strong on paper, you need that if you want to threaten everyone around you.
Luckily no one at Gaijin cares what some random little russian main at the forum thinks. They see the bug report thwy have gotten and will decide for themselfs what they want to do with the SEPv2.
Yes yes… This one is good this one is bad… A bunch of weasels 😂
You need all your luck with source reporting like this
My man 2.5k photos of destroyed equippment from the soviet era and modern production from conflicts that are happening around the world (one of which is in the EU continent) check out Oryx who counts loosses :) some of those photos are used in analysis by people who know more then we all here together and they say what happened and how some “facts” that you provided are absolutley false…
You can even use google to search for those photos/sites which do A DETAILED ANALYSIS and show how most of the stuff that companies state specially from the russian side were false and how much bs some of them provided…
1 Like
He is just here to derail. He is a little russia fanboy.
Wo der if we could ask a mod to send him to the shadow realm. Or we just flag him their ourselfs.
8 Likes
Unless this is some visual bug but somehow with the recent hotfix update they bugged the sepv2s armor it lost 88RHA armor on the side turret compared to SEPv1 lol.
2 Likes
remember to buy the premium
1 Like