M1097 Humvee (SL-AMRAAM) (HUMMER SPAAM)

With the use of only AIM9X can it operate in LOBL?
It could be a short range (5KM) sam system similar to MANPADS sutch as the MISTRAL or the STINGER.
With the AMRAAM it could maybe be launched also in LOBL with already an active seeker mode, reducing it’s range and making it comparable to other sams we have in game.

Edit:
I was wrong when making this comment.
The AIM-9X used on the SLAMRAAM is the AIM-9X Block 2 which obviously has LOBL.
It’s range is around 15km which is stated in the main post.

15km range for the initial AIM-120A/B and the AIM-9X is too mutch for the game rn (better than everything we have by a wide margin) but could be for sure implemented in the futur (or as Airfield protection on Air-RB)

3 Likes

So in theory if this vehicle is viable so would be a M727 mobile Hawk launcher?

3 Likes

I have been thinking about the final part of your comment, with the range of 15kms being to long, I think the game has proven it is ready, with the Pantsir’s 20km range, and having a search radar, sure this is fire and forget, but the Pantsir has more range and can find targets without just the use of eyes.

2 Likes

True, i feel like the SL-AMRAAM could be implemented rn with an early AIM-120A/B with 15/20km range.
Tbf i don’t play GRB but mostly ARB so i cannot really comment about it.
Since early AIM-120A/B were pretty bad ECCM wise, you could still dodge them and since they would be limited to LOBL they would still be pretty limited range wise (16km ARH seeker range).

I still think the AIM-9X blck 2 shouldn’t be implemented tho. Almost undodgable when its seeker locks on you, pretty good range (think double the range of the 9L) , and extremelly maneuvrable (60G + TVC).

TLDR: Yes for the AIM-120A/B, No for the newer AIM-120 (C5+) and for the AIM-9X Blck 2.

2 Likes

Yeah on the old forum i used to have a poll where you could vote for the variants, but with the new form I couldn’t be bothered to figure out how to re-add it.

2 Likes

I wouldn’t see it as beyond gaijin to make it a 9M.

I would guess they could do it like the AH-1Z where they started with the 9L and are upgrading it as new missiles get added

5 Likes

+1 US needs actual top tier SPAA, not a TD with unfair respawn costs

7 Likes

I wouldn’t even be particularly mad if it got 9Ms either to be completely honest

Anyone know what the range could be in game with the standard SL-AMRAAM, and the SL-AMRAAM-ER?

The US is in desperate need of a better SPAA. (Alongside everyone but Russia)

4 Likes

I don’t remember the source, but I’m pretty sure it’s between 15km and 25km depending on the AMRAAM used.

1 Like

It’s slightly off topic, but still…

Anyone, know anything about ground launchers for RIM-116? (Sidewinder with Stinger’s seeker)

I know, that this system (Sea RAM) used on bunch of vessels, but cant find anything about ground version.
BTW, it can be pretty solid counterpart of Strela-10 (even better), for 11.0 ground setup.

Something like HEMTT with Centurion C-RAM,

Ground Phalanx

image

but with (or it can be changable) EX-31 (which IRL been settled on modified Phalanx lafette.

EX-31 launcher

image

As long as that is IR missle (well, have a PRH seeker too, for intercepting ASMs, but we ain’t have them in GRB), its ain’t need radar for lock, and even can effectively intercept incoming AGMs, which can be pretty solid for SPAA even on top tier.

And if snail will bless us with SPAA datalink, which provide information from having radar allies, to those, who haven’t - it (radarless) will be problem no more.

No idea if that’s ever been done. It certainly can be done and would be quite easy; the whole point of Sea RAM is that it’s interchangeable with Phalanx mountings. But I’m not aware of anybody swapping out the Phalanx on a Centurion C-RAM with an RIM-116 launcher.

2 Likes

So much yes!

I’ve only ever known maddogging as an unlocked launch, bulldog is new to me.

1 Like

Needed +1

image
image

Different vehicle with same launcher. Yes, it supports 6x AMRAAM.

16 Likes

Yes please. (GOD PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE)

4 Likes

absolutley

1 Like

Voted yes, it wouldn’t be op as ppl usually think.

1 Like

Should already have been in game couple of patches ago.

1 Like