M1 has about double the mobility of any given russian MBT, not “slightly better”
2a4 is extremely similar to abrams except with superior armor and penetration in exchange for SLIGHTLY less mobility (emphasis on slightly) and a slower reload.
Play the 120s. It has better optics, thermals and is slow
I hate M60 based things my playstyle is fast and ratty
Then how are you complaining about the M1 being 10.7 when it’s the best MBT at 10.7 mobility wise and reload wise… by a long shot too.
Firepower
The firepower is the worst for MBT’s at it’s tier with M774 as it’s top tier shell it is very frustrating when you nonpen the LFP of T-series tanks
It reloads faster than most at this BR so some people would say that it has high firepower. The real downside is obviously the penetration but you can still pen most weakspots and for 10.7 its one of your only downsides
But with the turret ring nerf it rly should be 10.3 I hate it while living it bc the turret ring eats 3BM42 somehow.
only thing that should really happen is it getting better ammo, it shouldn’t go down in br
What better ammo can it get?
Edit: M900 would make it a higher B.R. and we already have the IPM1 so maybe M883?
M833 would be a minor but definitely an upgrade, and hardly enough to warrant a higher BR since its basically just slightly worse than 120mm DM23
Do you think it should get M883?
I think M833 is warranted for 10.7.
Yeh I agree
Give m833, fix turret basket and the model
problem solve, now 10.7 is deserve
if not
it should be 10.3
but then ground tt need decompression so
uptier mean u face 3bm46 or 3bm60, which mean ur a glass cannon most of the time
Yeh lol
I was wondering why there wasn’t any new Abrams cope threads… and here is one.
Even as is M1 is more 10.7 than 10.3. Its just outclassed by uptiers against the Type 90 and sorts.
The first M1 Abrams rotor material is incorrect, the rotor is fabricated from a slab instead of CHA. If implemented, the gun mantlet gets a small buff ~10mm.
Any help is appreciated