Lockheed XF-90A - USAF's First Jet With Afterburners

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Lockheed XF-90A

   Hello everybody. I’d like to suggest the Lockheed XF-90A for US aviation in War Thunder. The Lockheed XF-90A was a prototype escort and penetration fighter built in response to the United States Air Force requirement in 1945. It was the first USAF swept-wing fighter jet to be equipped with afterburners. Due to the woefully underpowered Westinghouse J34 powerplants, the XF-90A lost to the McDonnell XF-88A Voodoo in the competition and never entered production.

Key Characteristics

  • Long-Range Jet Fighter
  • Sturdy airframe with swept wings and wingtip fuel tanks
  • F-80A design heritage
  • Two Westinghouse J34-WE-15 axial-flow turbojets with afterburner
  • 6 x 20mm M24 cannons (not installed on prototype)

Credit goes to @Disco_Shrimp for some historical corrections. Thank you!

Conclusion | Why it should be in the game

   The XF-90A was the first USAF jet aircraft to feature an afterburner and the first Lockheed jet to exceed the speed of sound, albeit only in a dive. Despite several innovative design elements, its underpowered engines ultimately led to its failure in the penetration fighter competition. However, I believe it deserves a place in War Thunder as the earliest American jet fighter with afterburning capability. In-game, it could serve as a transitional aircraft between the F-80 Shooting Star and the F-104 Starfighter. While its acceleration would be subpar due to its excessive weight, the XF-90A’s robust construction and decent energy retention could make it a capable energy fighter and support aircraft in the right hands.

Related Suggestion

Also, if you’re interested in this kind of prototype, I previously made a suggestion for the North American YF-93A Sabre, one of the XF-90A’s direct competitors in the penetration fighter program. Check that one out as well!

Sources

Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion! 😃

8 Likes

How could anyone say no? But ol’ +1 from me man!

1 Like

Looks so damn cool! +1

1 Like

+1 Beautiful, Just Beautiful!

1 Like

Yeah I could see this as a great premium

Oh, it isn’t the hundredth clone of already existing plane? Wow!.. Good one.

… what? In what way does that indicate it was a clone of the already existing plane? Do you even look up and read on this particular aircraft?

1 Like

Definite +1!

Though hopefully not in the condition I found it in Dayton

Spoiler


2 Likes

A +1 from me, I would absolutely love to have the XF-90 in-game!

1 Like

-1

This plane was a neither a technological milestone nor it had any any impact on military aviation history. Even as i would describe myself as aviation enthusiast i see no point of adding a “loser plane” to war thunder - this aircraft is just a typical example of failed aircraft design & engineering.

The game lacks a lot of actually important early jets like the F-94 Starfire which saw combat in Korea - there is no need to waste any resources on prototypes (i exclude aircraft which were not built due to political reasons like the YF-23) which were inferior to their rivals.

“No loser aircraft! But also trust me the YF-23 was not a loser because uhhh.”
But you’re right the F-94 family should be a priority.

2 Likes

Definite plus one, gorgeous looking aircraft.

1 Like

Well. Counter question. Did you even read what I wrote? If so does “isn’t” mean something?

This thread definitely not bad, as is the specific craft. Which can’t be said about most of your other threads with two hundred thousand clone vehicles (with a million more well on the way for sure). Forgive me my lack of sarcasm restraint, huh. Plane’s good, pretty interesting it is.

1 Like

You missed the point regarding the XF-90:

Despite the area rule was discovered long before and was even applied to real aircraft (Ju 287 in 1944) the Lockheed engineers were unable to understand it - that’s why it was a failed design. Without the “coke bottle design” the drag increase ~ Mach 1 required way more power than the engines could deliver. Look up the F-102 story for more details.

Underpowered jets were nothing special at this time as the engine technology was either inferior (radial flow like the UK) or the demands / requirements of the USAF were too ambitious (=increasing weight) and could not be met due to a lack of power / thrust like in this case.

The YF-23 is a complete other story - and the fact that the F-22s was planned to retire from 2030 onwards whilst other nations are working on planes looking quite similar to the YF-23 might give you a hint that the claim that the YF-23 was the best fighter never going into production might be more than a myth / legend.

Just some small corrections in your history section:

  1. The first XF-90 prototype was also the first to be fitted with afterburning engines, the 24th test flight being the first with afterburners on 16 September 1949. Initial flights did use the XJ34-WE-22 before being replaced with the XJ34-WE-11 on the 24th flight. The second prototype wouldn’t fly until 12 April 1950, as stated in your history section. On top of this, the aircraft was never designated XF-90A; the confusion probably comes from the competing XF-88, which was redesigned to accept afterburning engines and redesignated XF-88A. The XF-90 was designed to take an afterburning engine from the start, with the first studies dating back to November 1947.

  2. The disposition of the first prototype is entirely unknown. It does not show up in any NACA records. If by chance it did elude all surviving records, it was most likely destroyed during the Crash Fire tests along with almost 100 other aircraft.

The XF-90 was definitely a great design, the downfall being the terrible engines it was fitted with. The initial afterburning XJ34-WE-11 engines, which were simply the XJ34-WE-22 engines fitted with afterburning equipment, were found to be much worse than expected, providing 20% less (!) thrust than the Westinghouse guarantee when not afterburning and 17.5% less thrust than the guarantee when afterburning. New XJ34-WE-11 engines were acquired for tests in November 1949 to replace the initial engines while they were being inspected (these engines had severe reliability issues and were prone to damage). Static tests of these engine revealed that afterburning only increased thrust by 35% while increasing fuel consumption by a whopping 80%. It was also determined from these tests that the non-afterburning thrust could be increased by 15.5% if false afterburners were fitted. Starting from the 63rd test flight, false afterburners were fitted until Westinghouse could develop an improved afterburner. The first XF-90 would never receive these engines, for it was the second XF-90 that would be fitted with the XJ34-WE-15 engines.

2 Likes

Great info, thanks! I presumed you got that information from Lockheed XF-90 Penetration Fighter by William Simone, which is an excellent source to read and research on this particular aircraft.

I have updated the history section.

2 Likes

THE SECOND PENCIL (pen truly) FIGHTER! :D

2 Likes

XF-90A Suggestion format updated.