Greetings, concerning the controversy about the next update
Let’s do some polls and see if Gaijin moves align with players’ expectations!
This is my first time making a poll !!!
Oh btw, Happy birthday to U.S. Army !!!
- Should the new AA in the next update be better than S1
- Are the new AA stats in DEV server are underperforming?
- Considering the price and BR, how would you believe the IR missile (Not including 27T/27ET) on MiG-29K should be, as a premium?
- Just R60M, stays at 12.7
- Give R73E, still 12.7
- Give R73E, rise to 13.0
- Do you believe the 120c-5 is underperforming?
- Yes, too slow
- Yes, the loft is too low
- Yes, it’s just being worse in-game
- No, it’s fine
- No, it’s overperforming
- Did Gaijin Devs Team take bug reports and players’ feedback responsibly
- Does the Kh-38 need the extra buff of GPS guidance?
- Should the RAH-66 gets a better Stealth performance?
- If the CAS situation in GRB still hasn’t improved after the big update, how willing are you to want Gaijin to make things right? [5=Super want Gaijin to fix it, 1=I don’t care about balance]
- Do you believe your opinion is being listened by Gaijin in this forum?
- Yes, sure
- I’m just a guy passing by
- No, not at all
Please don’t ban my post, I’m just collecting players’ opinions.
5 Likes
Based upon the dev server. The major issue it had/has isnt listed on there. The main upgrade out of the C5s isnt necessarily the better range, but instead the much better WVR performance, should pull more Gs and have less guidance delay ( I think no delay). Neither was modeled
Could also be given better notch-gate like the MICA has.
That would make it a worthwhile sidegrade over the Aim-120B.
On top of that then the C5 also has a bigger motor, meaning better range over the Aim-120A.
Now I could take or leave the better range, rarely will you make use of it. But the WVR performance would have given the Typhoon, F-15 and F-18 an ARH more on-par with the MICA EM and R-77-1
2 Likes
thank you for further explaining the change or unmodeled part in game, hopefully they will listen
but i guess they dont
1 Like
We have months, if not years long outstanding bug reports in the ASB community without even a single reply from technical mods.
So no.
3 Likes
alone bc of the rotor blades, you can’t make a heli that stealthy
but if you consider the range of hellfire, getting a better stealth is kinda make sense
we shouldn’t make stuff up…
Rather give it more advanced hellfires and put it into the TT
not the 1st day gaijin make stuff up
look at f16aj
that was acutally offered and was a perfectly usable weapon system
Unlike the Yak 141.
But we should raise the standard, not lower it or keep the same…
If really rasing the standard then no new AA will lose energy dramatically within 10km…
Mig-29 getting R-73s makes it 13.0: F-16A and Mig-29G say hi.
Things aren’t buffed/nerfed in War Thunder, they’re changed based on documents.
Also, I can tell most of the people voting have only started playing the game within the last 20 months.
There was an incident in May 2023 where the War Thunder forums rioted and Gaijin not only listened to the forums, they also created a special form on the early morning of May 18th to get even more feedback they could sort through easier.
@railgunDE112
Its BR would still be 11.3 with AGM-114Ks.
It can’t receive any other AGM-114s because there are no others that would allow it to be a BR below 13.3.
Your hatred of Comanche, Kikka, Yak-141, etc is noted.
no reason to not want to make it petter
I don’t hate the planes themselfs, but it being put in a game, marketing realistic battles, that started of with historical battles
All of those vehicles are realistic.
And all use what they would’ve historically got for the BR they are placed at.
Either way there’s no changing the Comanche’s BR because Gaijin’s not going to make any helicopter 13.3 with AGM-114Ls at this time.
Hello
Many of the things you mentioned relate to information based sources that would lead to a change in performance. Polls are not used to make changes to “improve” or “worsen” the performance of something artificially based on a comparison with another vehicle, missile or weaponry in game.
For this, we ask that all information be submitted via reports on the Community Bug Report Site: Community Bug Reporting System - Taking into account our rules for sourcing: Source Material: Restrictions on Classified and Export Restricted information (“Military Restrictions”)
Regarding the MiG-29 Sniper, the weaponry provided currently was to allow the vehicle to be 12.7 BR. This decision was factored in when reviewing the data we have from all MiG-29s currently at different BRs with and without R-73. The aircraft would not remain at 12.7 if it were to receive R-73.