I want muh 2A8 tho :(
and im also saying sweden doesn’t need any new tanks either, especially when you have nations like France, Israel, china and japan that are by far worse then both sweden and germany, germany’s top tier ground is either the 2nd best or 3rd best depending if you place it over the russians or not
I love it when my 2A6 with Trophy cannot be added because it upsets the balance at top tier (it’s only relevant against helicopters and ATGM heavy IFVs like the BMP-2M, but other than that it plays the same as the 2A6).
Probably has to do something with the 2A6 being better than what most other nations get in top tier already. Who knows, maybe it’s just me!
If there is something german top tier needs is a good SPAA since you face most of the CAS
Right, but then it’s simply an exchange of one MBT that plays the exact same for another MBT that plays the exact same but the Russian mains will hate because it will have a counter to the Kornet and Vikhrs.
For anybody else, it’s not much different since NATO nations barely if ever spawn helicopters, and “our” AFVs aren’t nearly as ATGM heavy, and Trophy can’t intercept a Maverick last I checked :p
1 Like
oh no I need a 5th meta leopard because sweden has 4 meta leopard and we need to have more then them, thats literally what this is coming off as, like I get it, its frustrating that the swedish have more leopards with the uparmoured hulls but there are nations in far worse spots
france’s most “protected” leclerc
Israels most advanced merkava
Japans best tank
1 Like
Well, not that I disagree. Add-on roof armor already makes it more annoying to kill, even with HE
I never said “I need it” because of Sweden, ty for putting words in my mouth.
Given that my line-up is literally just the 2A7V and 2A6 + support vehicles, nothing would change, apart from being even more hated by the Russians because their Kornets would be useless against 50% of my MBTs (i.e 1 tank).
2A7A1 doesn’t have roof add-on…? Unless you mean the upper frontal plate add-on, but it can still be overpressued I think? Would have to check tbh.
I’m talking in general. About the leopards that do have it. It prevents overpressure and only leaves a small spot in the front open
sorry that was someone else saying they need it because sweden has them my bad, but you arent free of putting words in peoples mouths
Well thats a gaijin way of solving a problem
lol only if they mount the gun upside down so it doesnt work correctly and has no depression
Edit my bad was thinking of the abrams
I… wasn’t putting words in anybody’s mouth there? You’re just throwing tu quoques now.
I say one word money. Large amount of auditory rolls too
And no, that’s if they remove its stabilization. After all, the Russians have broken it on the captured 2A6. So sure, give them a 2A6, just make it completely incapable of firing on the move.
On the other hand, give Germany, US and UK their own captured/purchased AFVs, i.e;
- T-80U for UK & Germany
- T-90A & T-72B 1989 for US
- Pantsir MAN 8x8 for US and Germany.
)))))
yeah I meant the abrams where they mounted the gun upside down
it also just looks naked without its machineguns
3 Likes
No difference, not like they are any harder to kill, I am more concerned about the T80BvM2023 which gets 25km reverse and maybe spall liners.
Britain doesn’t need any better tank, challenger 3 op