No, those are not captured vehicles. Captured vehicles are for events. Sub tree vehicles that are necessary like the Leopard 2A6M CAN need to be TT but Gaijin will make most good British tanks that stay good a event premium that is expensive and hard to get
1 Like
Both Canada and Australia are not even a subtree of UK. Their vehicle would be distributed according to the need. Idk why are they just not making a combined tree
Can that need be, letting Canadian’s use their tech together? Rather than ripping us apart and walking all over us.
As the CF-188 (modern jets that served with 2A6M CANs) and ADATS (last service SPAA) are in the UK tree. AKA there is a line-up.
But if we are looking at need, well, Germany has no need; they have the 2A6M, they operated, which this is basically a 1-1 of. Well, it does fill a need in the UK tree.
So if we look at the ways it could be added:
Germany: 100% event vehicle, never to be used/could join everything else Canada used. No line-up for the operator nation.
UK: possibly to be TT. Joining two other Canadian operator vehicles makes a somewhat rounded operator nation line-up.
Canadian or CAN-ANZAC tree: would be TT; however, no sign of this happening in any decent time frame.
1 Like
Glad you see my point my friend, even if I’m too dumb to fraise it properly
1 Like
Ask Gaijin for that. 2A4M was added to Germany so they might also add 2a6 to Germany as a prem
Neither did Germany need 2A4M yet they still got it
Sorry for misunderstanding, but wasn’t your point that leo is need as British stuff in underperforming a lot and hence is requiring leo and his point is that people should be able to play all Canadian vehicle together rather then it getting split apart by putting few vehicle in other tree (which i completely agree but i would rather have a combined tree)
That was part of it. Sorry, I’m hella tired today, I had to help lift a 300ish kg piano and a half tonne safe
Well not once you mention about that so how was i supposed to know what you meant? Anyways you should take some rest
1 Like
Thank you
1 Like
but canada is not a subtree, so i dont see your point
The whole issue is that australia and canada are not sub trees and should not be handled as such
time and resources, the simple answer is just that out of possible new standalone trees canada and australia just fall further behind potential trees that 1 can have a standalone tree and 2 have more indiginous vehicles.
Biggest example being korea
but neither does the UK need it, they already have 2 subtrees with an extended line ups possibility.
There is no reason to give UK MBTs of other main nations on top, they already gonna receive russian T-90s as well not to mention the announced Arjun and so on as well
Can i ask you something? Would you be ok if all Canadian vehicle were added to Germany instead of Britain?
Maybe if they are of German design and/or origin like with the 2A4M CAN but things like Ram 2 (as an example) then no
Wasn’t it only teased in the 2026 poster? I don’t think it has been properly announced yet
they already did it last year and all vehicles out of it got added
Since Finnish was introduce to Sweden with copypaste Leopard, it’s logic to see a Canadian Leopard 2A6 in UK tree, after the MBT vicker mk7
3 Likes
Even one would be so helpful and nice that we would almost start liking Gaijin again
just put them a good apfds and is over
finland is a subtree, canda is not , there is a difference